These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33967535)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Conventional Glass-ionomer Cement with Chitosan-modified Glass-ionomer and Bioactive Glass-modified Glass-ionomer Cement An Ranjani MS; Kavitha M; Venkatesh S Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 33967535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional Showkat I; Chaudhary S; Sinha AA; Manuja N; Telgi CR; Priya N; Kak MM Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S72-S76. PubMed ID: 37663222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial and Adhesive Properties of Chitosan Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: an In vitro Study. Debnath A; Kesavappa SB; Singh GP; Eshwar S; Jain V; Swamy M; Shetty P J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Mar; 11(3):ZC75-ZC78. PubMed ID: 28511515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of compressive and flexural strength, fluoride release and bacterial adhesion of GIC modified with CPP-ACP, bioactive glass, chitosan and MDPB. Kirthika N; Vidhya S; Sujatha V; Mahalaxmi S; Senthil Kumar R J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 33927836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study. Abraham D; Thomas AM; Chopra S; Koshy S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Jan; 7(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 25206230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effects and Surface Micro hardness of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53P4):An in vitro Study. Prabhakar AR; Paul M J; Basappa N Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 3(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 27507915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of Chitosan/TiO Ibrahim MA; Meera Priyadarshini B; Neo J; Fawzy AS J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 28190299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Analysis of Color Stability and Its Impact on Artificial Aging: An In Vitro Study of Bioactive Chitosan, Titanium, Zirconia, and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared With Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement. E DS; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54517. PubMed ID: 38516425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biocompatibility and mineralization activity of modified glass ionomer cement in human dental pulp stem cells. Chumpraman A; Tannukit S; Chotigeat W; Kedjarune-Leggat U J Dent Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(3):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 37404606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of antibacterial and adhesion properties of chitosan-modified glass ionomer cement. Ibrahim MA; Neo J; Esguerra RJ; Fawzy AS J Biomater Appl; 2015 Oct; 30(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 26079388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of glass ionomer cement added with propolis, chitosan, and chlorhexidine against Neelima B; Reddy JS; Singh PT; Suhasini K; Hemachandrika I; Hasanuddin S J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 33402619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translationally controlled tumor protein supplemented chitosan modified glass ionomer cement promotes osteoblast proliferation and function. Sangsuwan J; Wanichpakorn S; Kedjarune-Leggat U Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Sep; 54():61-8. PubMed ID: 26046268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sol-gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle-incorporated glass ionomer cement with or without chitosan for enhanced mechanical and biomineralization properties. Kim DA; Lee JH; Jun SK; Kim HW; Eltohamy M; Lee HH Dent Mater; 2017 Jul; 33(7):805-817. PubMed ID: 28535954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the Influence of Thermocycling on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Microhardness in Green-Mediated Nanocomposite-Enhanced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared to Traditional Glass Ionomer Cement. Ravi B; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56078. PubMed ID: 38618398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Properties of a proline-containing glass ionomer dental cement. Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Roohpour N; Chee WW; Schricker SR; Moshaverinia A J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 23998626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chitosan-Reinforced Gelatin Microspheres-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC): A Novel Bone Alloplast Graft Material Synthesis and an In Vivo Analysis. Surendran S; Rohinikumar S; Eswaramoorthy R; M K; Nesappan T; Rp A Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50384. PubMed ID: 38213376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Could Different Formulations of Grape Seed ( Aref NS; Abdallah RM Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 35068837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Spectrophotometric comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of various perforation repair materials with a novel eggshell modified GIC. Abraham S; Chandwani ED; Nagmode P; Lokhande N; Badgujar MB; Diggikar K J Conserv Dent Endod; 2023; 26(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 38292734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength of Ginger and Clove-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement. Paulraj J; Pushparathna B; Maiti S; Sharma N; Shanmugam R Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55964. PubMed ID: 38601383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bovine serum albumin release from novel chitosan-fluoro-aluminosilicate glass ionomer cement: stability and cytotoxicity studies. Limapornvanich A; Jitpukdeebodintra S; Hengtrakool C; Kedjarune-Leggat U J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):686-90. PubMed ID: 19501445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]