These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33969977)

  • 21. Perception of Age, Attractiveness, and Tiredness After Isolated and Combined Facial Subunit Aging.
    Forte AJ; Andrew TW; Colasante C; Persing JA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):856-69. PubMed ID: 26408388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Beauty judgment: review of the literature].
    Faure J; Bolender Y
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 24685247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Ideal Dimensions of the Ears, Nose, and Lip in the Circles of Prominence Theory on Facial Beauty.
    Young P
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2019 May; 21(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 30763411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The current preferred female lip ratio.
    Heidekrueger PI; Juran S; Szpalski C; Larcher L; Ng R; Broer PN
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):655-660. PubMed ID: 28318919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The "Brazilian" bikini-shaped lip-reduction technique: new developments in cheiloplasty.
    Sforza M; Andjelkov K; Zaccheddu R; Jovanovic M; Colic M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):827-31. PubMed ID: 22535138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When beauty breaks down: investigation of the effect of spatial quantisation on aesthetic evaluation of facial images.
    Bachmann T
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):840-9. PubMed ID: 17718363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative investigation of the esthetic impact of lip prominence in relation to the esthetic line.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Garagiola U; Wertheim D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 May; 159(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 33653639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of face proportions on face attractiveness.
    Przylipiak M; Przylipiak J; Terlikowski R; Lubowicka E; Chrostek L; Przylipiak A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):954-959. PubMed ID: 30291673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment options to optimize display of anterior dental esthetics in the patient with the aged lip.
    Perenack J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1634-41. PubMed ID: 16243181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages.
    Sriphadungporn C; Chamnannidiadha N
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28317085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of smile index and incisal edge position on perception of attractiveness in different age groups.
    Chou JC; Nelson A; Katwal D; Elathamna EN; Durski MT
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 43(11):855-862. PubMed ID: 27612023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptions of Attractive and Healthy-Looking Lips.
    Hwang K; Kim YS; Kim H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):596-603. PubMed ID: 30550445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contribution of the mandible position to the facial profile perception of a female facial profile: An eye-tracking study.
    Huang P; Cai B; Zhou C; Wang W; Wang X; Gao D; Bao B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):641-652. PubMed ID: 31677673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attractive Versus Golden Ratios: Formula of Utopian Beauty through Comparison of Facial Proportions among Worldwide Celebrities and Average People.
    Yalcinkaya E; Kocaman SA; Yuksekkaya M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1950-1955. PubMed ID: 35119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterization of a posed smile and evaluation of facial attractiveness by panel perception and its correlation with hard and soft tissue.
    Malhotra S; Sidhu MS; Prabhakar M; Kochhar AS
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2012; 13(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 22567614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics.
    Wong BJ; Karimi K; Devcic Z; McLaren CE; Chen WP
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jun; 118(6):962-74. PubMed ID: 18401273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion.
    Scott CR; Goonewardene MS; Murray K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 16905058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.