196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33971794)
1. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability.
Connell L; Lynott D
Cognition; 2012 Dec; 125(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 22935248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks.
Vergallito A; Petilli MA; Marelli M
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1599-1616. PubMed ID: 31950360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
Cortese MJ; Schock J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study.
Pollock L
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1198-1216. PubMed ID: 28707214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.
Peti-Stantić A; Anđel M; Gnjidić V; Keresteš G; Ljubešić N; Masnikosa I; Tonković M; Tušek J; Willer-Gold J; Stanojević MM
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1799-1816. PubMed ID: 33904142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words.
Schock J; Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 22037976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words.
Della Rosa PA; Catricalà E; Vigliocco G; Cappa SF
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1042-8. PubMed ID: 21139171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decoding the essence of two-character Chinese words: Unveiling valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, and imageability through word norming.
Chan YL; Tse CS
Behav Res Methods; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38750390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concreteness/abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH.
Xu X; Li J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0232133. PubMed ID: 32569306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emotion processing in concrete and abstract words: evidence from eye fixations during reading.
Yao B; Scott GG; Bruce G; Monteith-Hodge E; Sereno SC
Cogn Emot; 2024 Jul; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38961837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations.
Altın E; Okur N; Yalçın E; Eraçıkbaş AF; Aktan-Erciyes A
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():820702. PubMed ID: 35369194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring inconsistencies can lead you forward: Imageability and the x-ception theory.
Dellantonio S; Mulatti C; Pastore L; Job R
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():708. PubMed ID: 25076920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.
Muraki EJ; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 31552508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of conceptual concreteness on the reading acquisition and integration of novel words into semantic memory via thematic relations.
Ding J; Liang P; Guo X; Yang Y
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1132039. PubMed ID: 37251046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22936106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
Pexman PM; Muraki E; Sidhu DM; Siakaluk PD; Yap MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):453-466. PubMed ID: 30484218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
