These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33972208)

  • 1. Measuring genetic connectedness between herds based on high density SNP markers.
    Zhou ZW; Wang X; Ding XD
    Yi Chuan; 2021 Apr; 43(4):340-349. PubMed ID: 33972208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle.
    Amorim ST; Yu H; Momen M; de Albuquerque LG; Cravo Pereira AS; Baldi F; Morota G
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Nov; 98(11):. PubMed ID: 32877515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The genetic connectedness calculated from genomic information and its effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Zhang SY; Olasege BS; Liu DY; Wang QS; Pan YC; Ma PP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0201400. PubMed ID: 30063724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic Relatedness Strengthens Genetic Connectedness Across Management Units.
    Yu H; Spangler ML; Lewis RM; Morota G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Oct; 7(10):3543-3556. PubMed ID: 28860185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in connectedness over time in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Nieuwhof GJ; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 18073292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do stronger measures of genomic connectedness enhance prediction accuracies across management units?
    Yu H; Spangler ML; Lewis RM; Morota G
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4490-4500. PubMed ID: 30165381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proofs for genotype by environment interactions considering pedigree and genomic data from organic and conventional cow reference populations.
    Shabalina T; Yin T; May K; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4452-4466. PubMed ID: 33589254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Connectedness among herds of beef cattle bred under natural service.
    Tarrés J; Fina M; Piedrafita J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Feb; 42(1):6. PubMed ID: 20184760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
    Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole genomic prediction of growth and carcass traits in a Chinese quality chicken population.
    Zhang Z; Xu ZQ; Luo YY; Zhang HB; Gao N; He JL; Ji CL; Zhang DX; Li JQ; Zhang XQ
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28177394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.
    Meuwissen TH; Odegard J; Andersen-Ranberg I; Grindflek E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Aug; 46(1):49. PubMed ID: 25158793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of pedigree and various forms of marker-derived relationship coefficients in genomic prediction and their correlations.
    Solaymani S; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Esmailizadeh A; Tusell L; Momen M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):423-437. PubMed ID: 32003127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compression distance can discriminate animals by genetic profile, build relationship matrices and estimate breeding values.
    Hudson NJ; Porto-Neto L; Kijas JW; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():78. PubMed ID: 26464167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.