These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33972208)

  • 21. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
    Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic evaluation using SNP- and haplotype-based genomic relationship matrices in a closed line of Duroc pigs.
    Uemoto Y; Sato S; Kikuchi T; Egawa S; Kohira K; Sakuma H; Miyashita S; Arata S; Kojima T; Suzuki K
    Anim Sci J; 2017 Oct; 88(10):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 28557153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomic kinship construction to enhance genetic analyses in the human connectome project data.
    Kochunov P; Donohue B; Mitchell BD; Ganjgahi H; Adhikari B; Ryan M; Medland SE; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Blangero J; Fieremans E; Novikov DS; Marcus D; Van Essen DC; Glahn DC; Elliot Hong L; Nichols TE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Apr; 40(5):1677-1688. PubMed ID: 30496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genomic selection for resistance to mammalian bark stripping and associated chemical compounds in radiata pine.
    Nantongo JS; Potts BM; Klápště J; Graham NJ; Dungey HS; Fitzgerald H; O'Reilly-Wapstra JM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36218439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. GCA: an R package for genetic connectedness analysis using pedigree and genomic data.
    Yu H; Morota G
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):119. PubMed ID: 33588757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of alternative random regression and reaction norm models for whole genome predictions.
    Yang W; Chen C; Steibel JP; Ernst CW; Bates RO; Zhou L; Tempelman RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2678-92. PubMed ID: 26115256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying genomic connectedness and prediction accuracy from additive and non-additive gene actions.
    Momen M; Morota G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Sep; 50(1):45. PubMed ID: 30223766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
    Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current status of genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic selection of milk fatty acid composition in Sarda dairy sheep: Effect of different phenotypes and relationship matrices on heritability and breeding value accuracy.
    Cesarani A; Gaspa G; Correddu F; Cellesi M; Dimauro C; Macciotta NPP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3189-3203. PubMed ID: 30799105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimates of genetic variance and variance of predicted genetic merits using pedigree or genomic relationship matrices in six Brown Swiss cattle populations for different traits.
    Loberg A; Dürr JW; Fikse WF; Jorjani H; Crooks L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):376-85. PubMed ID: 25727736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phenotypic relationships, genetic parameters, genome-wide associations, and identification of potential candidate genes for ketosis and fat-to-protein ratio in German Holstein cows.
    Klein SL; Scheper C; Brügemann K; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jul; 102(7):6276-6287. PubMed ID: 31056336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.