These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33972647)

  • 1. Shoulder strap fixation of LUCAS-2 to facilitate continuous CPR during non-supine (stair) stretcher transport of OHCAs patients.
    Chen CB; Chen KF; Chien CY; Kuo CW; Goh ZNL; Seak CK; Seak JC; Seak CJ;
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9858. PubMed ID: 33972647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.
    Gyory RA; Buchle SE; Rodgers D; Lubin JS
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28435494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chest Compression Fraction between Mechanical Compressions on a Reducible Stretcher and Manual Compressions on a Standard Stretcher during Transport in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ASIA-CPR) Pilot Trial.
    Kim TH; Shin SD; Song KJ; Hong KJ; Ro YS; Song SW; Kim CH
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(5):636-644. PubMed ID: 28467138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator.
    Kim TH; Hong KJ; Sang Do S; Kim CH; Song SW; Song KJ; Ro YS; Ahn KO; Jang DB
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 34(8):1604-9. PubMed ID: 27318749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation.
    Gates S; Lall R; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Cooke MW; Horton J; Lamb SE; Slowther AM; Woollard M; Carson A; Smyth M; Wilson K; Parcell G; Rosser A; Whitfield R; Williams A; Jones R; Pocock H; Brock N; Black JJ; Wright J; Han K; Shaw G; Blair L; Marti J; Hulme C; McCabe C; Nikolova S; Ferreira Z; Perkins GD
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Mar; 21(11):1-176. PubMed ID: 28393757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Ambulance Stretcher Bed Height Adjustment on CPR Quality and Rescuer Fatigue in a Laboratory Environment.
    Ho CS; Hsu YJ; Li F; Tang CC; Yang CP; Huang CC; Ho CS; Chang CH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(13):2783-2788. PubMed ID: 34220306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.
    Tranberg T; Lassen JF; Kaltoft AK; Hansen TM; Stengaard C; Knudsen L; Trautner S; Terkelsen CJ
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 23():37. PubMed ID: 25898992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Zhan L; Yang LJ; Huang Y; He Q; Liu GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD010134. PubMed ID: 28349529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Perkins GD; Lall R; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Cooke MW; Horton J; Lamb SE; Slowther AM; Woollard M; Carson A; Smyth M; Whitfield R; Williams A; Pocock H; Black JJ; Wright J; Han K; Gates S;
    Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9972):947-55. PubMed ID: 25467566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical LUCAS resuscitation is effective, reduces physical workload and improves mental performance of helicopter teams.
    Rehatschek G; Muench M; Schenk I; Dittrich W; Schewe JC; Dirk C; Hering R
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Apr; 82(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 26576860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
    Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Chest Compression Quality between Transfer Sheet and Stretcher Use for Transporting out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in a High-Rise Building - A Randomized and Open-Label Cross-over Design.
    Chi CY; Renhao DM; Yang CW; Yang MF; Lee HJ; Lee CH; Shih FF; Ong EHM; Ko PC
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2021; 25(3):370-376. PubMed ID: 32301640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No Benefit in Neurologic Outcomes of Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Mechanical Compression Device.
    Newberry R; Redman T; Ross E; Ely R; Saidler C; Arana A; Wampler D; Miramontes D
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 29345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial.
    Drinhaus H; Nüsgen S; Adams N; Wetsch WA; Annecke T
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 28(1):16. PubMed ID: 32131894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective for in-hospital cardiac arrest when performed on a stretcher. A manikin study.
    Tezel O; Bilge S; Özkan G
    Saudi Med J; 2021 Jan; 42(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 33399174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality Comparison of the Manual Chest Compression and the Mechanical Chest Compression During Difficult Transport Conditions.
    Bekgöz B; Şan İ; Ergin M
    J Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 58(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 32229137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system.
    Yost D; Phillips RH; Gonzales L; Lick CJ; Satterlee P; Levy M; Barger J; Dodson P; Poggi S; Wojcik K; Niskanen RA; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2012 Aug; 83(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 22310728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of chest compression quality in walking versus straddling cardiopulmonary resuscitation during stretcher transportation: A prospective randomised crossover study using manikins.
    Shinchi M; Kobayashi M; Soma K; Maeda A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216739. PubMed ID: 31112576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a novel device that maintains the balance of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation performer in a moving ambulance to improve chest compression quality.
    Feng SY; Song YQ; Zhang YL; Li Y
    Singapore Med J; 2013 Nov; 54(11):645-8. PubMed ID: 24276102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.