These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33973331)

  • 21. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    John A; Lim A; Catterwell R; Selth L; O'Callaghan M
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 36859711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
    Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Refining the American Urological Association and American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy using the pathologic Gleason score.
    Song W; Kwon YS; Jeon SS; Kim IY
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 26620454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Anastasiou I; Tyritzis SI; Adamakis I; Mitropoulos D; Stravodimos KG; Katafigiotis I; Balangas A; Kollias A; Pavlakis K; Constantinides CA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Sep; 43(3):715-20. PubMed ID: 21053071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Van den Broeck T; van den Bergh RCN; Arfi N; Gross T; Moris L; Briers E; Cumberbatch M; De Santis M; Tilki D; Fanti S; Fossati N; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Lardas M; Liew M; Rouvière O; Pecanka J; Mason MD; Schoots IG; van Der Kwast TH; van Der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Willemse PM; Yuan Y; Lam TB; Cornford P; Mottet N
    Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):967-987. PubMed ID: 30342843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Mar; 43(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 30557174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Somford DM; van Oort IM; Cosyns JP; Witjes JA; Kiemeney LA; Tombal B
    World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 21240506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
    Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F
    BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Gleason Grade Group 5 in a Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System and Literature Review.
    Kamitani R; Matsumoto K; Kosaka T; Takeda T; Hashiguchi A; Tanaka N; Morita S; Mizuno R; Shinojima T; Asanuma H; Oya M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Feb; 19(1):69-75.e5. PubMed ID: 32863190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gleason score at the margin can predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, in addition to preoperative PSA and surgical margin status.
    Özkanli SŞ; Zemher IE; Yildirim A; Gür HD; Balbay MD; Şenol S; Özkanli AO; Alkan E; Zenginkinet T; Aydin A; Çaşkurlu T
    Turk J Med Sci; 2014; 44(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 25558640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.
    Taguchi S; Uemura Y; Fujimura T; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kawai T; Suzuki M; Kume H; Fukuhara H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 32357849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.
    Panunzio A; Sorce G; Hoeh B; Hohenhorst L; Tappero S; Nimer N; Rajwa P; Tian Z; Terrone C; Chun FKH; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Cerruto MA; Antonelli A; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(3):268-276. PubMed ID: 36336728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.