These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3397334)

  • 1. Relationships of pelvic structure, body measurements, pelvic area and calving difficulty.
    Johnson SK; Deutscher GH; Parkhurst A
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 3397334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminant analysis for predicting dystocia in beef cattle. I. Comparison with regression analysis.
    Morrison DG; Humes PE; Keith NK; Godke RA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):608-16. PubMed ID: 3988637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers: II. Using discriminant analysis.
    Basarab JA; Rutter LM; Day PA
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1372-80. PubMed ID: 8325796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers.
    Colburn DJ; Deutscher GH; Nielsen MK; Adams DC
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 9250504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of selection strategies using heifer pelvic area and sire birth weight expected progeny difference on dystocia in first-calf heifers.
    Cook BR; Tess MW; Kress DD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 8463146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing calving difficulty in beef heifers.
    Naazie A; Makarechian MM; Berg RT
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3243-9. PubMed ID: 2613572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pelvic growth, calf birth weight and dystocia in Holstein x Hereford heifers.
    Gaines JD; Peschel D; Kauffman RG; Schaefer DM; Badtram G; Kumi-Diaka J; Clayton MK; Milliken G
    Theriogenology; 1993 Jul; 40(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of predicting dystocia in yearling beef heifers: I. Using ratios of pelvic area to birth weight or pelvic area to heifer weight.
    Basarab JA; Rutter LM; Day PA
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1359-71. PubMed ID: 8325795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic, phenotypic, and environmental parameter estimates of calving difficulty, weight, and measures of pelvic size in beef heifers.
    Naazie A; Makarechian M; Berg RT
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4793-800. PubMed ID: 1808175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting and prediction of dystocia in Charolais heifers.
    Rutter LM; Ray DE; Roubicek CB
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Nov; 57(5):1077-83. PubMed ID: 6643312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new application of pelvis area data as culling tool to aid in the management of dystocia in heifers.
    Holm DE; Webb EC; Thompson PN
    J Anim Sci; 2014 May; 92(5):2296-303. PubMed ID: 24668951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting dystocia in Brahman-cross heifers in subtropical southeastern United States.
    Bellows RA; Genho PC; Moore SA; Chase CC
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jul; 74(7):1451-6. PubMed ID: 8818787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pelvic dimensions and occurrence of dystocia in Black-and-White and Holstein-Friesian heifers.
    Nogalski Z; Barański W
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2023 Dec; 26(4):687-693. PubMed ID: 38088415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dystocia in 3-year-old beef heifers; relationship to maternal nutrient intake during early- and mid-gestation, pelvic area and hormonal indicators of placental function.
    Micke GC; Sullivan TM; Rolls PJ; Hasell B; Greer RM; Norman ST; Perry VE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Apr; 118(2-4):163-70. PubMed ID: 19762178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminant analysis for predicting dystocia in beef cattle. II. Derivation and validation of a prebreeding prediction model.
    Morrison DG; Humes PE; Keith NK; Godke RA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):617-21. PubMed ID: 3988638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of body measurements and weight on calf size and calving difficulty of Holsteins.
    Sieber M; Freeman AE; Kelley DH
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Sep; 72(9):2402-10. PubMed ID: 2592650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical applicability of external and internal body dimensions in predicting dystocia in late-gestation Holstein-Friesian heifers.
    Nogalski Z; Piwczyński D; Nogalska A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2024 Jan; 59(1):e14506. PubMed ID: 37955268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical utility of calf front hoof circumference and maternal intrapelvic area in predicting dystocia in 103 late gestation Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows.
    Hiew MW; Megahed AA; Townsend JR; Singleton WL; Constable PD
    Theriogenology; 2016 Feb; 85(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 26474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences.
    Bennett GL; Thallman RM; Snelling WM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2103-14. PubMed ID: 18441079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The predictive value of pelvimetry in beef cattle.
    Van Donkersgoed J; Ribble CS; Booker CW; McCartney D; Janzen ED
    Can J Vet Res; 1993 Jul; 57(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 8358677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.