BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33973746)

  • 21. Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions.
    Sugimoto M; Irie H; Takagi T; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Kobayashi Y; Hashimoto Y; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1094. PubMed ID: 33176750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
    Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Ayres LR; Kmiotek EK; Lam E; Telford JJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():1415062. PubMed ID: 29850451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.
    Soltani AK; Krishnan K
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 32680792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
    Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The level of agreement between rapid-on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate and surgical histological diagnosis in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 Jul; 32(4):436-440. PubMed ID: 33983646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
    Fujita A; Ryozawa S; Tanisaka Y; Ogawa T; Suzuki M; Katsuda H; Tashima T; Araki R; Mizuide M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Histologic Core Portions Acquired from a Core Biopsy Needle and a Conventional Needle in Solid Mass Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Lee BS; Cho CM; Jung MK; Jang JS; Bae HI
    Gut Liver; 2017 Jul; 11(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 28208006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
    Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Crinò SF; Di Mitri R; Nguyen NQ; Tarantino I; de Nucci G; Deprez PH; Carrara S; Kitano M; Shami VM; Fernández-Esparrach G; Poley JW; Baldaque-Silva F; Itoi T; Manfrin E; Bernardoni L; Gabbrielli A; Conte E; Unti E; Naidu J; Ruszkiewicz A; Amata M; Liotta R; Manes G; Di Nuovo F; Borbath I; Komuta M; Lamonaca L; Rahal D; Hatamaru K; Itonaga M; Rizzatti G; Costamagna G; Inzani F; Curatolo M; Strand DS; Wang AY; Ginès À; Sendino O; Signoretti M; van Driel LMJW; Dolapcsiev K; Matsunami Y; van der Merwe S; van Malenstein H; Locatelli F; Correale L; Scarpa A; Larghi A
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Sep; 161(3):899-909.e5. PubMed ID: 34116031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.