These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33973840)

  • 1. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
    Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
    Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
    Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
    Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Durand MA; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Copit DS; Barke LD; Rose SL; Hayes MK; Greer LN; Dabbous FM; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33258744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval cancer in the Córdoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone.
    Pulido-Carmona C; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Cara-García M; Font-Ugalde P; Elías-Cabot E; Pedrosa-Garriguet M; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5427-5438. PubMed ID: 38177619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography Screening Performance on Successive Screening Rounds from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Coley RY; Lowry KP; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Su YR; Lee CI; Onega T; Bowles EJA; Herschorn SD; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e223142. PubMed ID: 37249433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Randomized Trial Comparing Breast Cancer Incidence and Interval Cancers after Tomosynthesis Plus Mammography versus Mammography Alone.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Duffy SW; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Mancuso P; Ragazzi M; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 35103537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Johnson K; Lång K; Ikeda DM; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
    Radiology; 2021 Jun; 299(3):559-567. PubMed ID: 33825509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
    Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.