These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33974128)

  • 21. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
    Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of a three-day estimated food record, a 72-hour recall and a food-frequency questionnaire for dietary assessment in a Mediterranean Spanish population.
    Schröder H; Covas MI; Marrugat J; Vila J; Pena A; Alcántara M; Masiá R
    Clin Nutr; 2001 Oct; 20(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 11534938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (RiksmatenFlex) in Swedish Adolescents: Comparison and Validation Study.
    Lindroos AK; Petrelius Sipinen J; Axelsson C; Nyberg G; Landberg R; Leanderson P; Arnemo M; Warensjö Lemming E
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Oct; 21(10):e12572. PubMed ID: 31588902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can the EPIC food-frequency questionnaire be used in adolescent populations?
    Lietz G; Barton KL; Longbottom PJ; Anderson AS
    Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 12570886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall web application against urinary recovery biomarkers in a sample of French-speaking adults of the province of Québec, Canada.
    Paradis F; Lamarche B; Robitaille J; Couillard C; Lafrenière J; Tremblay AJ; Corneau L; Lemieux S
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2022 Feb; 47(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 35057638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing the diet of adolescent girls in the UK.
    Robinson S; Skelton R; Barker M; Wilman C
    Public Health Nutr; 1999 Dec; 2(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 10656477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods.
    Al-Shaar L; Yuan C; Rosner B; Dean SB; Ivey KL; Clowry CM; Sampson LA; Barnett JB; Rood J; Harnack LJ; Block J; Manson JE; Stampfer MJ; Willett WC; Rimm EB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1122-1132. PubMed ID: 33350436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of protein intake assessed from weighed dietary records against protein estimated from 24 h urine samples in children, adolescents and young adults participating in the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study.
    Bokhof B; Günther AL; Berg-Beckhoff G; Kroke A; Buyken AE
    Public Health Nutr; 2010 Jun; 13(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 20074394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment.
    Bingham SA; Day NE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire in Comparison with a 7-Day Dietary Record for Measuring Dietary Intake in a Population of Survivors of Colorectal Cancer.
    Koole JL; Bours MJL; Breedveld-Peters JJL; van Roekel EH; van Dongen MCJM; Eussen SJPM; van Zutphen M; van Duijnhoven FJB; Boshuizen HC; Weijenberg MP
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Feb; 120(2):245-257. PubMed ID: 31806573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Overestimation of infant and toddler energy intake by 24-h recall compared with weighed food records.
    Fisher JO; Butte NF; Mendoza PM; Wilson TA; Hodges EA; Reidy KC; Deming D
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2008 Aug; 88(2):407-15. PubMed ID: 18689377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of an interactive 24-h recall and weighed food record for measuring energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods among 9-10-month-old Malawian infants consuming lipid-based nutrient supplements.
    Hemsworth J; Arimond M; Kumwenda C; Rehman AM; Maleta K; Ashorn U; Keogh R; Ferguson EL
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 30350761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies.
    Touvier M; Kesse-Guyot E; Méjean C; Pollet C; Malon A; Castetbon K; Hercberg S
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Apr; 105(7):1055-64. PubMed ID: 21080983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies.
    Liu B; Young H; Crowe FL; Benson VS; Spencer EA; Key TJ; Appleby PN; Beral V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Nov; 14(11):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 21729481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring the Feasibility of Use of An Online Dietary Assessment Tool (myfood24) in Women with Gestational Diabetes.
    Gianfrancesco C; Darwin Z; McGowan L; Smith DM; Haddrill R; Carter M; Scott EM; Alwan NA; Morris MA; Albar SA; Cade JE
    Nutrients; 2018 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30142898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validation of a computer-based food record for older adults: the Novel Assessment of Nutrition and Ageing (NANA) method.
    Timon CM; Astell AJ; Hwang F; Adlam TD; Smith T; Maclean L; Spurr D; Forster SE; Williams EA
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Feb; 113(4):654-64. PubMed ID: 25630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire used in the JACC study.
    Date C; Fukui M; Yamamoto A; Wakai K; Ozeki A; Motohashi Y; Adachi C; Okamoto N; Kurosawa M; Tokudome Y; Kurisu Y; Watanabe Y; Ozasa K; Nakagawa S; Tokui N; Yoshimura T; Tamakoshi A;
    J Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl I):S9-23. PubMed ID: 15881192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ji Y; Plourde H; Bouzo V; Kilgour RD; Cohen TR
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e16953. PubMed ID: 32902389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.