These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33974664)

  • 1. Middle ratings rise regardless of grammatical construction: Testing syntactic variability in a repeated exposure paradigm.
    Brown JMM; Fanselow G; Hall R; Kliegl R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251280. PubMed ID: 33974664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look.
    Do ML; Kaiser E
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1851. PubMed ID: 29118726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early grammar-building in French-speaking deaf children with cochlear implants: A follow-up corpus study.
    Le Normand MT; Thai-Van H
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023; 58(4):1204-1222. PubMed ID: 36740971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of repeated evaluation and repeated exposure on acceptability ratings of sentences.
    Zervakis J; Mazuka R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2013 Dec; 42(6):505-25. PubMed ID: 23179954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training sentence production in agrammatism: implications for normal and disordered language.
    Thompson CK; Shapiro LP
    Brain Lang; 1995 Aug; 50(2):201-24. PubMed ID: 7583187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backward Dependencies and
    Pablos L; Doetjes J; Cheng LL
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2237. PubMed ID: 29375417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension.
    Weber K; Indefrey P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1164-72. PubMed ID: 19328233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages.
    Meir I; Aronoff M; Börstell C; Hwang SO; Ilkbasaran D; Kastner I; Lepic R; Lifshitz Ben-Basat A; Padden C; Sandler W
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():189-207. PubMed ID: 27837693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for a difference in syntactic knowledge between skilled and less skilled adult readers.
    Cupples L; Holmes VM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1992 Jul; 21(4):249-74. PubMed ID: 1403994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of lexical, pragmatic, and morphological violations on reading time and deviance ratings of English and German sentences.
    Wichman AL; Friel BM; Harris RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Apr; 29(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 11407426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of priming in grammatical acceptability judgements for native versus non-native speakers: Effects of intelligibility.
    Constantine RR; Getty DJ; Fraundorf SH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275191. PubMed ID: 36170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction.
    Abeillé A; Hemforth B; Winckel E; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104293. PubMed ID: 32731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syntactic processing in Korean-English bilingual production: evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming.
    Shin JA; Christianson K
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 19394593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: evidence from Italian and German languages.
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Roivainen E
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):848-854. PubMed ID: 29873624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Favor referential representations.
    Frazier L; McNamara P
    Brain Lang; 1995 Jun; 49(3):224-40. PubMed ID: 7640964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.
    Frank SL; Ernst P
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1581-1593. PubMed ID: 29687232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning a generative syntax from transparent syntactic atoms in the linguistic input.
    Ninio A
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1249-75. PubMed ID: 24229562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of recovery for grammatical category information during lexical processing for syntactic construction.
    Pechmann T; Garrett M; Zerbst D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 15099139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.