296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33974885)
21. An in silico planning study comparing doses and estimated risk of toxicity in 3D-CRT, IMRT and proton beam therapy of patients with thymic tumours.
Lideståhl A; Mondlane G; Gubanski M; Lind PA; Siegbahn A
Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():120-126. PubMed ID: 31000071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Log file-based dose reconstruction and accumulation for 4D adaptive pencil beam scanned proton therapy in a clinical treatment planning system: Implementation and proof-of-concept.
Meijers A; Jakobi A; Stützer K; Guterres Marmitt G; Both S; Langendijk JA; Richter C; Knopf A
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 30609061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inverse-planned deliverable 4D-IMRT for lung SBRT.
Hamzeei M; Modiri A; Kazemzadeh N; Hagan A; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5145-5160. PubMed ID: 30153339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of motion mitigation using abdominal compression in the clinical implementation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy of liver tumors.
Lin L; Souris K; Kang M; Glick A; Lin H; Huang S; Stützer K; Janssens G; Sterpin E; Lee JA; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Ben-Josef E
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):703-712. PubMed ID: 28133755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer.
Yu J; Zhang X; Liao L; Li H; Zhu R; Park PC; Sahoo N; Gillin M; Li Y; Chang JY; Komaki R; Lin SH
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1111-8. PubMed ID: 26936698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proton pencil beam scanning for mediastinal lymphoma: the impact of interplay between target motion and beam scanning.
Zeng C; Plastaras JP; Tochner ZA; White BM; Hill-Kayser CE; Hahn SM; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):3013-29. PubMed ID: 25789418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 4D dose calculation for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of pancreatic cancer using repeated 4DMRI datasets.
Dolde K; Naumann P; Dávid C; Gnirs R; Kachelrieß M; Lomax AJ; Saito N; Weber DC; Pfaffenberger A; Zhang Y
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165005. PubMed ID: 30020079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetric feasibility of 4DCT-ventilation imaging guided proton therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Huang Q; Jabbour SK; Xiao Z; Yue N; Wang X; Cao H; Kuang Y; Zhang Y; Nie K
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):78. PubMed ID: 29695284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Limited Impact of Setup and Range Uncertainties, Breathing Motion, and Interplay Effects in Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Inoue T; Widder J; van Dijk LV; Takegawa H; Koizumi M; Takashina M; Usui K; Kurokawa C; Sugimoto S; Saito AI; Sasai K; Van't Veld AA; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):661-9. PubMed ID: 27681763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.
Lin LL; Kirk M; Scholey J; Taku N; Kiely JB; White B; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 26372435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical Note: 4D robust optimization in small spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for distal esophageal carcinoma.
Feng H; Shan J; Ashman JB; Rule WG; Bhangoo RS; Yu NY; Chiang J; Fatyga M; Wong WW; Schild SE; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4636-4647. PubMed ID: 34058026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of intrafraction and residual interfraction effect on prostate proton pencil beam scanning.
Tang S; Deville C; Tochner Z; Wang KK; McDonough J; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 25442043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of various gating approaches for PBS proton therapy of pancreatic cancer using 4D-MRI datasets.
Dolde K; Naumann P; Dávid C; Kachelriess M; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Saito N; Burigo LN; Pfaffenberger A; Zhang Y
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(8):085011. PubMed ID: 30893660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dose calculations accounting for breathing motion in stereotactic lung radiotherapy based on 4D-CT and the internal target volume.
Admiraal MA; Schuring D; Hurkmans CW
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18082905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of organ motion on volumetric and dosimetric parameters in stomach lymphomas treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Uchinami Y; Suzuki R; Katoh N; Taguchi H; Yasuda K; Miyamoto N; Ito YM; Shimizu S; Shirato H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):78-86. PubMed ID: 31400082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Beam-specific planning target volumes incorporating 4D CT for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of thoracic tumors.
Lin L; Kang M; Huang S; Mayer R; Thomas A; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):5678. PubMed ID: 26699580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
