153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33975126)
1. Think fast! The implications of emphasizing urgency in decision-making.
Evans NJ
Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104704. PubMed ID: 33975126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making.
Evans NJ; Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HLJ
Cogn Psychol; 2020 Sep; 121():101292. PubMed ID: 32217348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making.
Evans NJ; Trueblood JS; Holmes WR
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):193-206. PubMed ID: 30924107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
Evans NJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson's disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions.
Huang YT; Georgiev D; Foltynie T; Limousin P; Speekenbrink M; Jahanshahi M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():577-87. PubMed ID: 26184442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.
Rae B; Heathcote A; Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1226-43. PubMed ID: 24797438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method, framework, and tutorial for efficiently simulating models of decision-making.
Evans NJ
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2390-2404. PubMed ID: 30924105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint Modelling of Latent Cognitive Mechanisms Shared Across Decision-Making Domains.
Stevenson N; Innes RJ; Boag RJ; Miletić S; Isherwood SJS; Trutti AC; Heathcote A; Forstmann BU
Comput Brain Behav; 2024; 7(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 38425991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bromocriptine does not alter speed-accuracy tradeoff.
Winkel J; van Maanen L; Ratcliff R; van der Schaaf ME; van Schouwenburg MR; Cools R; Forstmann BU
Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():126. PubMed ID: 22969702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early evidence affects later decisions: why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data.
Winkel J; Keuken MC; van Maanen L; Wagenmakers EJ; Forstmann BU
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 24395093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes?
Donkin C; Brown S; Heathcote A; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 21327360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A parallel accumulator model accounts for decision randomness when deciding on risky prospects with different expected value.
Howlett JR; Paulus MP
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233761. PubMed ID: 32702026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of urgency in decision making based on dynamic information.
Ferrucci L; Genovesio A; Marcos E
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 17(10):e1009455. PubMed ID: 34606494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociable mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff during visual perceptual learning are revealed by a hierarchical drift-diffusion model.
Zhang J; Rowe JB
Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():69. PubMed ID: 24782701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
Brown SD; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making.
Hawkins GE; Wagenmakers EJ; Ratcliff R; Brown SD
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 25904706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.
Forstmann BU; Ratcliff R; Wagenmakers EJ
Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():641-66. PubMed ID: 26393872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal dynamics of decision making: A synthesis of computational and neurophysiological approaches.
Harris A; Hutcherson CA
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 13(3):e1586. PubMed ID: 34854573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are accuracy and reaction time affected via different processes?
Mulder MJ; van Maanen L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80222. PubMed ID: 24260358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speeded multielement decision-making as diffusion in a hypersphere: Theory and application to double-target detection.
Smith PL; Corbett EA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):127-162. PubMed ID: 29968205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
