197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33975496)
1. Readability Analysis of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Patient Educational Brochures.
Pakhchanian H; Yuan M; Raiker R; Waris S; Geist C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 33975496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures.
Eid K; Eid A; Wang D; Raiker RS; Chen S; Nguyen J
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 40(2):212-216. PubMed ID: 37972974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.
Kapoor K; George P; Evans MC; Miller WJ; Liu SS
Cardiology; 2017; 138(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 28571004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability assessment of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons patient brochures with suggestions for improvement.
Schumaier AP; Kakazu R; Minoughan CE; Grawe BM
JSES Open Access; 2018 Jul; 2(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 30675586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social Media: Is the Message Reaching the Plastic Surgery Audience?
Chen AD; Ruan QZ; Bucknor A; Chattha AS; Bletsis PP; Furnas HJ; Lee BT; Lin SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):773-781. PubMed ID: 31461046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
Docimo S; Seeras K; Acho R; Pryor A; Spaniolas K
Hernia; 2022 Jun; 26(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 35344107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Multimetric Readability Analysis of Online Patient Educational Materials for Submental Fat Reduction.
Chang IA; Wells MW; Zheng DX; Mulligan KM; Wong C; Scott JF; Zins JE
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):712-718. PubMed ID: 35037081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Misra P; Agarwal N; Kasabwala K; Hansberry DR; Setzen M; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Jan; 123(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23023924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.
Kasabwala K; Misra P; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Baredes S; Setzen M; Eloy JA
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Apr; 3(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 23044857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.
Lucy AT; Rakestraw SL; Stringer C; Chu D; Grams J; Stahl R; Mustian MN
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6519-6525. PubMed ID: 37277519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal deformity from top academic orthopedic institutions.
Michel C; Dijanic C; Abdelmalek G; Sudah S; Kerrigan D; Gorgy G; Yalamanchili P
Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 35819724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia.
Rai R; Wiseman JJ; Chau A; Wiseman SM
Can J Anaesth; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38773007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RTAnswers Online Patient Education Materials Deviate From Recommended Reading Levels.
Rosenberg SA; Denu RA; Francis D; Hullett CR; Fisher M; Schuster JM; Bassetti MF; Kimple RJ
Appl Radiat Oncol; 2018; 7(2):26-30. PubMed ID: 34169120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.
Colaco M; Svider PF; Agarwal N; Eloy JA; Jackson IM
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1048-52. PubMed ID: 23017508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for shoulder arthroplasty from top academic orthopedic institutions.
Stelzer JW; Wellington IJ; Trudeau MT; Mancini MR; LeVasseur MR; Messina JC; Mazzocca AD
JSES Int; 2022 Jan; 6(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 35141675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor Readability of AOSSM Patient Education Resources and Opportunities for Improvement.
Kakazu R; Schumaier A; Minoughan C; Grawe B
Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Nov; 6(11):2325967118805386. PubMed ID: 30480008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Readability of Anesthesia-Related Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Organizations.
Pashkova A; Bangalore R; Tan C; Svider PF; Korban A; Yam YK; Chaudhry F; Eloy JA; Eloy JD
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3284199. PubMed ID: 35872854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
