154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33976782)
1. Alternative reproductive tactics in male freshwater fish influence the accuracy of species recognition.
Fujimoto S; Tsurui-Sato K; Katsube N; Tatsuta H; Tsuji K
Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):3884-3900. PubMed ID: 33976782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plasticity of the mate choice mind: courtship evokes choice-like brain responses in females from a coercive mating system.
Wang SM; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME
Genes Brain Behav; 2014 Apr; 13(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 24548673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
Deaton R
Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview.
Schlupp I;
Curr Zool; 2018 Jun; 64(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 30402080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Copulation type affects parturition in the guppy.
Sato A; Shimoichi A; Karino K
Zoolog Sci; 2011 Feb; 28(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21303201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish.
Godin JG; Auld HL
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 23919148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bio-robotic cues show how the Trinidadian guppy male recognises the morphological features of receptive females.
Romano D; Stefanini C
Behav Processes; 2021 Jan; 182():104283. PubMed ID: 33227377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for stronger discrimination between conspecific and heterospecific mating partners in sexual
Stork S; Jalinsky J; Neiman M
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14470. PubMed ID: 36447513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Female mating status affects male mating tactic expression in the wolf spider
Bunch S; Wilgers DJ
Curr Zool; 2022 Feb; 68(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 35169635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of androgens in species recognition and sperm production in Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana).
Gabor CR; Aspbury AS; Ma J; Nice CC
Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 22061426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.
Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP
BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male size and reproductive performance in three species of livebearing fishes (Gambusia spp.): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim B; Moran NP; Reinhold K; Sánchez-Tójar A
J Anim Ecol; 2021 Oct; 90(10):2431-2445. PubMed ID: 34231219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does heterospecific seminal fluid reduce fecundity in interspecific copulation between seed beetles?
Kyogoku D; Sota T
J Insect Physiol; 2015 Jan; 72():54-60. PubMed ID: 25497118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adult female hamsters avoid interspecific mating after exposure to heterospecific males.
Delbarco-Trillo J; McPhee ME; Johnston RE
Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2010 Aug; 64(8):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 20676390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
Godin JJ
Oecologia; 1995 Aug; 103(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 28306777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
