These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33976849)

  • 1. Meta-analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards.
    Fediajevaite J; Priestley V; Arnold R; Savolainen V
    Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):4803-4815. PubMed ID: 33976849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Needle in a haystack? A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding and targeted qPCR for detection of the great crested newt (
    Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Hahn C; Boonham N; Rees HC; Gough KC; Lewis E; Adams IP; Brotherton P; Phillips S; Hänfling B
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Jun; 8(12):6330-6341. PubMed ID: 29988445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of eDNA for monitoring of the Great Crested Newt in the UK.
    Rees HC; Bishop K; Middleditch DJ; Patmore JR; Maddison BC; Gough KC
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Nov; 4(21):4023-32. PubMed ID: 25505530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.
    Banerjee P; Stewart KA; Dey G; Antognazza CM; Sharma RK; Maity JP; Saha S; Doi H; de Vere N; Chan MWY; Lin PY; Chao HC; Chen CY
    AoB Plants; 2022 Aug; 14(4):plac031. PubMed ID: 35990516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of an environmental DNA assay to detect federally threatened groundwater salamanders in central Texas.
    Adcock ZC; Adcock ME; Forstner MRJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288282. PubMed ID: 37428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey.
    Johnson MD; Fokar M; Cox RD; Barnes MA
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 34872490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader.
    Smart AS; Tingley R; Weeks AR; van Rooyen AR; McCarthy MA
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1944-52. PubMed ID: 26591459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental DNA and visual encounter surveys for amphibian biomonitoring in aquatic environments of the Ecuadorian Amazon.
    Quilumbaquin W; Carrera-Gonzalez A; Van der Heyden C; Ortega-Andrade HM
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15455. PubMed ID: 37456876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. eDNA metabarcoding: a promising method for anuran surveys in highly diverse tropical forests.
    Lopes CM; Sasso T; Valentini A; Dejean T; Martins M; Zamudio KR; Haddad CFB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):904-914. PubMed ID: 27987263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
    Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using eDNA for mammal inventories still needs naturalist expertise, a meta-analysis.
    Van Leeuwen P; Michaux J
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e10788. PubMed ID: 38077514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plant-derived environmental DNA complements diversity estimates from traditional arthropod monitoring methods but outperforms them detecting plant-arthropod interactions.
    Weber S; Stothut M; Mahla L; Kripp A; Hirschler L; Lenz N; Junker A; Künzel S; Krehenwinkel H
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Feb; 24(2):e13900. PubMed ID: 38010630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refinement of eDNA as an early monitoring tool at the landscape-level: study design considerations.
    Mize EL; Erickson RA; Merkes CM; Berndt N; Bockrath K; Credico J; Grueneis N; Merry J; Mosel K; Tuttle-Lau M; Von Ruden K; Woiak Z; Amberg JJ; Baerwaldt K; Finney S; Monroe E
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01951. PubMed ID: 31188494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traditional trapping methods outperform eDNA sampling for introduced semi-aquatic snakes.
    Rose JP; Wademan C; Weir S; Wood JS; Todd BD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219244. PubMed ID: 31265475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution.
    Takahashi M; Saccò M; Kestel JH; Nester G; Campbell MA; van der Heyde M; Heydenrych MJ; Juszkiewicz DJ; Nevill P; Dawkins KL; Bessey C; Fernandes K; Miller H; Power M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Newton JP; White NE; Richards ZT; Allentoft ME
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162322. PubMed ID: 36801404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles.
    Davy CM; Kidd AG; Wilson CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130965. PubMed ID: 26200348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long distance (>20 km) downstream detection of endangered stream frogs suggests an important role for eDNA in surveying for remnant amphibian populations.
    Villacorta-Rath C; Hoskin CJ; Strugnell JM; Burrows D
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12013. PubMed ID: 34692243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA).
    Schultz MT; Lance RF
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141503. PubMed ID: 26509674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.