BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33977465)

  • 1. Oocyte cryopreservation versus ovarian tissue cryopreservation for adult female oncofertility patients: a cost-effectiveness study.
    Chung EH; Lim SL; Myers E; Moss HA; Acharya KS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Sep; 38(9):2435-2443. PubMed ID: 33977465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling of live-birth rates and cost-effectiveness of oocyte cryopreservation for cancer patients prior to high- and low-risk gonadotoxic chemotherapy.
    Lyttle Schumacher B; Grover N; Mesen T; Steiner A; Mersereau J
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2049-2055. PubMed ID: 28938728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis.
    Hirshfeld-Cytron J; Grobman WA; Milad MP
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Mar; 97(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 22265038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing.
    Mesen TB; Mersereau JE; Kane JB; Steiner AZ
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1551-6.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25881876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.
    Walker Z; Lanes A; Ginsburg E
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Jan; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 34996479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
    Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Experience of Fertility Preservation in a Single Tertiary Center in Korea.
    Choi YJ; Hong YH; Kim S; Kim SK; Lee JR; Suh CS
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():845051. PubMed ID: 35518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation for preservation of fertility in post-pubertal oncological women submitted to high-risk gonadotoxic chemotherapy.
    Raimondo D; Giaquinto I; Maletta M; Vicenti R; Iodice R; Arena A; Del Forno S; Raffone A; Lenzi J; Casadio P; Seracchioli R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 35044702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ovarian function preservation with GnRH agonist during chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer.
    Huang Y; Huang X; Huang X; Lin S; Luo S; Gu D; Weng X; Xu X
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1099-1110. PubMed ID: 37075316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 418 girls and adolescents up to 15 years of age facing highly gonadotoxic treatment. Twenty years of experience at a single center.
    Poirot C; Brugieres L; Yakouben K; Prades-Borio M; Marzouk F; de Lambert G; Pacquement H; Bernaudin F; Neven B; Paye-Jaouen A; Pondarre C; Dhedin N; Drouineaud V; Chalas C; Martelli H; Michon J; Minard V; Lezeau H; Doz F; Sarnacki S; Philippe-Chomette P; Dufour C; Laurence V; Baruchel A; Wolf JP; Boissel N; Valteau-Couanet D; Dalle JH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 May; 98(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30919447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization treatment in a cohort of Danish women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue.
    Dueholm Hjorth IM; Kristensen SG; Dueholm M; Humaidan P
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 32624219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth.
    Devine K; Mumford SL; Goldman KN; Hodes-Wertz B; Druckenmiller S; Propst AM; Noyes N
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1446-53.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25813281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing the scope of in vitro maturation for fertility preservation: transvaginal retrieval of immature oocytes during endoscopic gynaecological procedures.
    Song XL; Lu CL; Zheng XY; Nisenblat V; Zhen XM; Yang R; Li M; Li R; Yuan YF; Ma CH; Liu P; Feng HL; Yan J; Qiao J
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):837-846. PubMed ID: 32154563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in prepubertal girls and young women: an analysis of parents' and patients' decision-making.
    Sullivan-Pyke CS; Carlson CA; Prewitt M; Gracia CR; Ginsberg JP
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Apr; 35(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 29392516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
    Fraison E; Huberlant S; Labrune E; Cavalieri M; Montagut M; Brugnon F; Courbiere B
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 36421038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of ovarian tissue harvesting and immature oocyte collection for fertility preservation increases preservation yield.
    Hourvitz A; Yerushalmi GM; Maman E; Raanani H; Elizur S; Brengauz M; Orvieto R; Dor J; Meirow D
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Oct; 31(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 26278808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of fertility preservation outcomes in patients who froze oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue for medically indicated circumstances: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ní Dhonnabháin B; Elfaki N; Fraser K; Petrie A; Jones BP; Saso S; Hardiman PJ; Getreu N
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1266-1276. PubMed ID: 35459522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long term pregnancy outcomes of women with cancer following fertility preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu Z; Ibrahim S; Burdett S; Rydzewska L; Al Wattar BH; Davies MC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():41-48. PubMed ID: 36535069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fertility preservation for men with testicular cancer: Is sperm cryopreservation cost effective in the era of assisted reproductive technology?
    Gilbert K; Nangia AK; Dupree JM; Smith JF; Mehta A
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):92.e1-92.e9. PubMed ID: 29169844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.