These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33977533)
1. Body in the face of uncertainty: The role of autonomic arousal and interoception in decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Herman AM; Esposito G; Tsakiris M Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13840. PubMed ID: 33977533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk. FeldmanHall O; Glimcher P; Baker AL; Phelps EA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27690508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detailed analysis of skin conductance responses during a gambling task: Decision, anticipation, and outcomes. Agren T; Millroth P; Andersson P; Ridzén M; Björkstrand J Psychophysiology; 2019 Jun; 56(6):e13338. PubMed ID: 30672602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interoceptive ability predicts aversion to losses. Sokol-Hessner P; Hartley CA; Hamilton JR; Phelps EA Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(4):695-701. PubMed ID: 24916358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of decision making in school-aged children and adolescents: evidence from heart rate and skin conductance analysis. Crone EA; van der Molen MW Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1288-301. PubMed ID: 17650139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Place your bets: psychophysiological correlates of decision-making under risk. Studer B; Clark L Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 11(2):144-58. PubMed ID: 21380769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive performance and autonomic reactivity in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. Fishbein D; Hyde C; Eldreth D; London ED; Matochik J; Ernst M; Isenberg N; Steckley S; Schech B; Kimes A Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Feb; 13(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 15727501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interoceptive sensibility tunes risk-taking behaviour when body-related stimuli come into play. Salvato G; De Maio G; Bottini G Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2396. PubMed ID: 30787367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Listening to your heart. How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Dunn BD; Galton HC; Morgan R; Evans D; Oliver C; Meyer M; Cusack R; Lawrence AD; Dalgleish T Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1835-44. PubMed ID: 21106893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease. Brand M; Grabenhorst F; Starcke K; Vandekerckhove MM; Markowitsch HJ Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1305-17. PubMed ID: 17070876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual differences in risk-taking tendencies modulate the neural processing of risky and ambiguous decision-making in adolescence. Blankenstein NE; Schreuders E; Peper JS; Crone EA; van Duijvenvoorde ACK Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():663-673. PubMed ID: 29408323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved decision-making and psychophysiological responses in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy after anterior temporal lobectomy. Sandor S; Delil Ş; Yağcı S; Korkmaz B; Yeni SN Epileptic Disord; 2018 Dec; 20(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 30530428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task. Wu Y; Van Dijk E; Aitken M; Clark L Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 26667365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making? Osmont A; Cassotti M; Agogué M; Houdé O; Moutier S Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):572-7. PubMed ID: 25030206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychophsyiological reactivity during uncertainty and ambiguity processing in high and low worriers. Kirschner H; Hilbert K; Hoyer J; Lueken U; Beesdo-Baum K J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Mar; 50():97-105. PubMed ID: 26143445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gut feelings and the reaction to perceived inequity: the interplay between bodily responses, regulation, and perception shapes the rejection of unfair offers on the ultimatum game. Dunn BD; Evans D; Makarova D; White J; Clark L Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 22618636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]