168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33979099)
1. Diagnostic Values of 8 Different Imaging Modalities for Preoperative Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
Kim K; Shim SR; Kim SJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):331-339. PubMed ID: 33979099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic values of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT, CT, and US for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Thyroid Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim K; Shim SR; Lee SW; Kim SJ
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201076. PubMed ID: 33595337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Li Z; Gao Y; Gong H; Feng W; Ma Q; Li J; Lu X; Wang X; Lei J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 May; 57(5):1392-1403. PubMed ID: 36054564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective comparative study of ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
Guney IB; Dalci K; Teke ZT; Kucuker KA
Ann Ital Chir; 2020; 91():458-464. PubMed ID: 32213685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography versus conventional imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases.
Shao M; Zi J; Wen G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 14(Supplement):S661-S666. PubMed ID: 30249884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
An YS; Lee DH; Yoon JK; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Kang DK; Kim KS; Jung YS; Yim H
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 24220324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Avril N; Dose J; Jänicke F; Ziegler S; Römer W; Weber W; Herz M; Nathrath W; Graeff H; Schwaiger M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Sep; 88(17):1204-9. PubMed ID: 8780629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of primary tumor (18)F-FDG uptake on preoperative PET/CT for predicting intratumoral lymphatic invasion and axillary nodal metastasis.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Park SY; Chung MH
Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):712-7. PubMed ID: 26219608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axilla in breast cancer.
Crippa F; Agresti R; Seregni E; Greco M; Pascali C; Bogni A; Chiesa C; De Sanctis V; Delledonne V; Salvadori B; Leutner M; Bombardieri E
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 39(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 9443729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PET-CT and MRI for evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients.
Dulgeroglu O; Arikan AE; Capkinoglu E; Kara H; Uras C
Ann Ital Chir; 2022; 93():648-655. PubMed ID: 36617275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging--initial findings.
Stadnik TW; Everaert H; Makkat S; Sacré R; Lamote J; Bourgain C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Oct; 16(10):2153-60. PubMed ID: 16670863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography of breast cancer in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis: comparison with ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT.
Monzawa S; Adachi S; Suzuki K; Hirokaga K; Takao S; Sakuma T; Hanioka K
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Dec; 23(10):855-61. PubMed ID: 19876704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer.
Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Omata J; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Kondo T; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
BMC Cancer; 2008 Jun; 8():165. PubMed ID: 18541009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Cooper KL; Meng Y; Harnan S; Ward SE; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D; Wyld L; Ingram C; Wilkinson ID; Lorenz E
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. PubMed ID: 21276372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools.
Marino MA; Avendano D; Zapata P; Riedl CC; Pinker K
Oncologist; 2020 Feb; 25(2):e231-e242. PubMed ID: 32043792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of ultrasonography and FDG-PET in axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer.
Ahn JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Ryu YH; Jeong J
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):859-65. PubMed ID: 20670083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Current Issues and Literature Review.
Choi HY; Park M; Seo M; Song E; Shin SY; Sohn YM
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 28187012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
