202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33979732)
21. Effects of facet joint degeneration on stress alterations in cervical spine C5-C6: A finite element analysis.
Wang HH; Wang K; Deng Z; Li XF; Qin YX; Zhan HS; Niu WX
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(6):7447-7457. PubMed ID: 31698622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Thoracic spinal kinematics is affected by the grade of intervertebral disc degeneration, but not by the presence of the ribs: An in vitro study.
Liebsch C; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2020 Mar; 20(3):488-498. PubMed ID: 31654810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical investigation on the influence of the regional material degeneration of an intervertebral disc in a lower lumbar spinal unit: A finite element study.
Masni-Azian ; Tanaka M
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jul; 98():26-38. PubMed ID: 29758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Finite element modeling of kinematic and load transmission alterations due to cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
Womack W; Leahy PD; Patel VV; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 21785298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis.
Guo X; Zhou J; Tian Y; Kang L; Xue Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):340. PubMed ID: 33836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics.
Puttlitz CM; Rousseau MA; Xu Z; Hu S; Tay BK; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2809-14. PubMed ID: 15599283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.
Li Y; Zhang Z; Liao Z; Mo Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():932-938. PubMed ID: 28736356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Ke W; Wang B; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of stress patterns on a spinal motion segment in healthy versus osteoporotic bony models with or without disc degeneration: a finite element analysis.
Tsouknidas A; Sarigiannidis SO; Anagnostidis K; Michailidis N; Ahuja S
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 25576902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study.
Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 10619089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical analysis of single- and double-level cervical disc arthroplasty using finite element modeling.
Rahman WU; Jiang W; Zhao F; Li Z; Wang G; Yang G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jan; 237(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 36394294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Differences Among Kinematic Parameters for Evaluating the Quality of Intervertebral Motion of the Cervical Spine in Clinical and Experimental Studies: Concepts, Research and Measurement Techniques. A Literature Review.
Sang D; Cui W; Guo Z; Sang H; Liu B
World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():343-357.e1. PubMed ID: 31550538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Wang BY; Rong X; Hong Y; Ding C; Chen H; Liu H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 30704444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
