BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33979759)

  • 1. Towards improved breast mass detection using dual-view mammogram matching.
    Yan Y; Conze PH; Lamard M; Quellec G; Cochener B; Coatrieux G
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Jul; 71():102083. PubMed ID: 33979759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DV-DCNN: Dual-view deep convolutional neural network for matching detected masses in mammograms.
    AlGhamdi M; Abdel-Mottaleb M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Aug; 207():106152. PubMed ID: 34058629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fusion of k-Gabor features from medio-lateral-oblique and craniocaudal view mammograms for improved breast cancer diagnosis.
    Sasikala S; Ezhilarasi M
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 30197344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.
    Jones MA; Sadeghipour N; Chen X; Islam W; Zheng B
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7670-7683. PubMed ID: 37083190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. YOLO Based Breast Masses Detection and Classification in Full-Field Digital Mammograms.
    Aly GH; Marey M; El-Sayed SA; Tolba MF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105823. PubMed ID: 33190942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system.
    Al-Masni MA; Al-Antari MA; Park JM; Gi G; Kim TY; Rivera P; Valarezo E; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():85-94. PubMed ID: 29477437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification.
    Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Sep; 117():44-54. PubMed ID: 30032964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion in Digital Mammogram.
    Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Kim TS
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1213():59-72. PubMed ID: 32030663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early detection and classification of abnormality in prior mammograms using image-to-image translation and YOLO techniques.
    Baccouche A; Garcia-Zapirain B; Zheng Y; Elmaghraby AS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106884. PubMed ID: 35594582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
    Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography.
    James JJ; Giannotti E; Chen Y
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Oct; 73(10):886-892. PubMed ID: 29970247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
    Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved mammographic CAD performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework.
    Velikova M; Samulski M; Lucas PJ; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1131-47. PubMed ID: 19174596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms.
    Qian W; Song D; Lei M; Sankar R; Eikman E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 17434066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.