These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33980017)
1. Efficacy of Removal of Residual Dental Cement by Laser, Ultrasonic Scalers, and Titanium Curette: An In Vitro Study. Fletcher P; Linden E; Cobb C; Zhao D; Rubin J; Planzos P Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2021 May; 42(5):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33980017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the impact of scaler material composition on polished titanium implant abutment surfaces. Hasturk H; Nguyen DH; Sherzai H; Song X; Soukos N; Bidlack FB; Van Dyke TE J Dent Hyg; 2013 Aug; 87(4):200-11. PubMed ID: 23986413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Titanium particles generated during ultrasonic scaling of implants. Harrel SK; Wilson TG; Pandya M; Diekwisch TGH J Periodontol; 2019 Mar; 90(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 30312471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments. Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instrumentation With Ultrasonic Scalers Facilitates Cleaning of the Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants. Park JB; Lee SH; Kim N; Park S; Jin SH; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 24552131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro study. Hakki SS; Tatar G; Dundar N; Demiralp B Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):563-571. PubMed ID: 28160204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment with various ultrasonic scaler tips affects efficiency of brushing of SLA titanium discs. Park JB; Jang YJ; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e119-23. PubMed ID: 23524804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High speed imaging of biofilm removal from a dental implant model using ultrasonic cavitation. Vyas N; Grewal M; Kuehne SA; Sammons RL; Walmsley AD Dent Mater; 2020 Jun; 36(6):733-743. PubMed ID: 32299665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resin cement removal from titanium dental implant surface using a novel side-firing laser fiber and Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation. Walinski CJ; Ou KL Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):178-182. PubMed ID: 32794390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces. Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonic Instrument Effects on Different Implant Surfaces: Profilometry, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Microbiology In Vitro Study. Faccioni F; Bevilacqua L; Porrelli D; Khoury A; Faccioni P; Turco G; Frassetto A; Maglione M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 34115066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the Er:YAG laser irradiation on titanium implant materials and contaminated implant abutment surfaces. Matsuyama T; Aoki A; Oda S; Yoneyama T; Ishikawa I J Clin Laser Med Surg; 2003 Feb; 21(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 12614554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement. Sahrmann P; Winkler S; Gubler A; Attin T BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33413296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]