These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies. Malomane DK; Reimer C; Weigend S; Weigend A; Sharifi AR; Simianer H BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 29304727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken. Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of genotype imputation strategies using a combined reference panel for chicken population. Ye S; Yuan X; Huang S; Zhang H; Chen Z; Li J; Zhang X; Zhang Z Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 30370890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imputation across genotyping arrays for genome-wide association studies: assessment of bias and a correction strategy. Johnson EO; Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Saccone NL; Bierut LJ; Page GP Hum Genet; 2013 May; 132(5):509-22. PubMed ID: 23334152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies. Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens. Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():101. PubMed ID: 26282557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations. Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design of low density SNP chips for genotype imputation in layer chicken. Herry F; Hérault F; Picard Druet D; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S BMC Genet; 2018 Dec; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 30514201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle. Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1. O'Brien AC; Judge MM; Fair S; Berry DP J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 30722011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extent to which array genotyping and imputation with large reference panels approximate deep whole-genome sequencing. Hanks SC; Forer L; Schönherr S; LeFaive J; Martins T; Welch R; Gagliano Taliun SA; Braff D; Johnsen JM; Kenny EE; Konkle BA; Laakso M; Loos RFJ; McCarroll S; Pato C; Pato MT; Smith AV; ; Boehnke M; Scott LJ; Fuchsberger C Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Sep; 109(9):1653-1666. PubMed ID: 35981533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imputation to whole-genome sequence using multiple pig populations and its use in genome-wide association studies. van den Berg S; Vandenplas J; van Eeuwijk FA; Bouwman AC; Lopes MS; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jan; 51(1):2. PubMed ID: 30678638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens. Herry F; Hérault F; Lecerf F; Lagoutte L; Doublet M; Picard-Druet D; Bardou P; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S BMC Genomics; 2023 May; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 37208589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken. Kranis A; Gheyas AA; Boschiero C; Turner F; Yu L; Smith S; Talbot R; Pirani A; Brew F; Kaiser P; Hocking PM; Fife M; Salmon N; Fulton J; Strom TM; Haberer G; Weigend S; Preisinger R; Gholami M; Qanbari S; Simianer H; Watson KA; Woolliams JA; Burt DW BMC Genomics; 2013 Jan; 14():59. PubMed ID: 23356797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips. Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels. Faux P; Druet T Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]