These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33980261)

  • 21. 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.
    Malter AD; McNeney B; Loeser JD; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 9563113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: complications in the elderly.
    Hoffmann MF; Jones CB; Sietsema DL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Jan; 8():1. PubMed ID: 23317417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.
    Mooney J; Nathani KR; Zeitouni D; Michalopoulos GD; Wang MY; Coric D; Chan AK; Lu DC; Sherrod BA; Gottfried ON; Shaffrey CI; Than KD; Goldberg JL; Hussain I; Virk MS; Agarwal N; Glassman SD; Shaffrey ME; Park P; Foley KT; Chou D; Slotkin JR; Tumialán LM; Upadhyaya CD; Potts EA; Fu KG; Haid RW; Knightly JJ; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Asher AL; Bydon M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Mar; 40(3):331-342. PubMed ID: 38039534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effects of Marijuana Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion.
    Jakoi AM; Kirchner GJ; Kerbel YE; Iorio JA; Khalsa AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):629-634. PubMed ID: 31770339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up.
    Sato S; Yagi M; Machida M; Yasuda A; Konomi T; Miyake A; Fujiyoshi K; Kaneko S; Takemitsu M; Machida M; Yato Y; Asazuma T
    Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1536-44. PubMed ID: 25681581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Navigated robot-guided pedicle screws placed successfully in single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Huntsman KT; Riggleman JR; Ahrendtsen LA; Ledonio CG
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):643-647. PubMed ID: 31625074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery.
    Lieber AM; Kirchner GJ; Kerbel YE; Khalsa AS
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):212-217. PubMed ID: 30010044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Posterior Lumbar Fusion-An Analysis of 90-Day Complications and Readmissions.
    Malik AT; Drain JP; Jones J; Karnes J; Brewster J; Ryu R; Singh V; Kim J; Khan SN; Yu E
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e168-e174. PubMed ID: 34052447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.
    Strong MJ; Yee TJ; Khalsa SSS; Saadeh YS; Swong KN; Kashlan ON; Szerlip NJ; Park P; Oppenlander ME
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E4. PubMed ID: 32871568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.
    Street JT; Andrew Glennie R; Dea N; DiPaola C; Wang Z; Boyd M; Paquette SJ; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 27104286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Arthrodesis for Spinal Stenosis.
    Kong C; Li X; Sun X; Ding J; Guo M; Lu S
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Dec; 132():e949-e955. PubMed ID: 31254702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of open and percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw revision rate using 3-D image guidance and intraoperative CT.
    Santos ER; Sembrano JN; Yson SC; Polly DW
    Orthopedics; 2015 Feb; 38(2):e129-34. PubMed ID: 25665118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuo CC; Merchant M; Kardile MP; Yacob A; Majid K; Bains RS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):1530-1537. PubMed ID: 31181016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison.
    Schatlo B; Molliqaj G; Cuvinciuc V; Kotowski M; Schaller K; Tessitore E
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 24725180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The European Robotic Spinal Instrumentation (EUROSPIN) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study of pedicle screw revision surgery after robot-guided, navigated and freehand thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Staartjes VE; Molliqaj G; van Kampen PM; Eversdijk HAJ; Amelot A; Bettag C; Wolfs JFC; Urbanski S; Hedayat F; Schneekloth CG; Abu Saris M; Lefranc M; Peltier J; Boscherini D; Fiss I; Schatlo B; Rohde V; Ryang YM; Krieg SM; Meyer B; Kögl N; Girod PP; Thomé C; Twisk JWR; Tessitore E; Schröder ML
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e030389. PubMed ID: 31501123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of Worker's Compensation Claims on Outcomes and Costs Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Tabaraee E; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Elboghdady IM; Aboushaala K; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(12):948-53. PubMed ID: 26070041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Effects of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion by Conventional Open versus Percutaneous Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement in Elderly Patients.
    Feng S; Tian W; Wei Y
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 31880084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.