These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33980768)

  • 21. Radiopacity of bulk fill flowable resin composite materials.
    Yildirim T; Ayar MK; Akdag MS; Yesilyurt C
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 20(2):200-204. PubMed ID: 28091437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro radiographic analysis of the density of dental luting cements as measured by CCD-based digital radiography.
    Antonijevic D; Jevremovic D; Jovanovic S; Obradovic-Djuricic K
    Quintessence Int; 2012 May; 43(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 22536594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of image acquisition parameters on the radiopacity of bulk-fill and nanocomposite resins.
    Alérico MS; Panzarella FK; França FMG; Lima CAS; Junqueira JLC; Raitz R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Aug; 132(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 33184008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Leaching behaviors of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing composite resin component elements immersed in water.
    Iwata J; Asakura M; Hayashi T; Tsuruta S; Hori M; Nagase Y; Mieki A; Ban S; Kawai T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 30679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the Translucency of Novel Monolithic CAD/CAM Materials Affect Resin Cement Polymerization with Different Curing Modes?
    Caprak YO; Turkoglu P; Akgungor G
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e572-e579. PubMed ID: 30039898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiopacity evaluation of composite restorative resins and bonding agents using digital and film x-ray systems.
    Oztas B; Kursun S; Dinc G; Kamburoglu K
    Eur J Dent; 2012 Apr; 6(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22509113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system.
    Yaylacı A; Karaarslan ES; Hatırlı H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Sep; 51(3):261-269. PubMed ID: 34621653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of composite resin restoration radiopacity on radiographic diagnosis and decision-making.
    Canto JDA; de Mendonça LS; de Arruda JAA; Alvares PR; Moreno A; Pontual MLA; da Silveira MMF
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(5):72-76. PubMed ID: 31454328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments.
    Elsaka SE
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 25516881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the Radiopacities of Bulk-fill Restoratives Using Two Digital Radiography Systems.
    Yasa E; Yasa B; Aglarci OS; Ertas ET
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(5):E197-205. PubMed ID: 26237642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications reduce biofilm formation in vitro.
    Ionescu AC; Hahnel S; König A; Brambilla E
    Dent Mater; 2020 May; 36(5):603-616. PubMed ID: 32238271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restorative CAD/CAM materials in dentistry: analysis of their fluorescence properties and the applicability of the fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT).
    Klein C; Krespach M; Spintzyk S; Wolff D; von Ohle C; Meller C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4579-4589. PubMed ID: 33447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative study of radiopacity of resin-based and glass ionomer-based bulk-fill restoratives using digital radiography.
    Yasa B; Kucukyilmaz E; Yasa E; Ertas ET
    J Oral Sci; 2015 Jun; 57(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 26062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiopacity of composite dental materials using a digital X-ray system.
    Dukic W; Delija B; Derossi D; Dadic I
    Dent Mater J; 2012 Feb; 31(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 22277605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiopacity evaluation of different types of resin restorative materials using a digital radiography system.
    Gündoğdu C; Akgül S
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 36920599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and unreinforced composite resin CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed dental prostheses.
    Başaran EG; Ayna E; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 23395334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Wing KR; Ruyter IE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Dec; 47(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 2609948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.
    Soares LM; Razaghy M; Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 29366492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices.
    Alharbi A; Ardu S; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    Odontology; 2017 Apr; 105(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 27456684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiopacity of Posterior Restorative Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Balci M; Turkun LS; Boyacıoglu H; Guneri P; Ergucu Z
    Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):337-346. PubMed ID: 37079911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.