These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33984125)

  • 1. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: short-term efficacy of sutureless compared with stented bioprostheses.
    Paparella D; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; De Santis A; Fattouch K; Martinelli L; Coppola R; Mikus E; Albertini A; Del Giglio M; Gregorini R; Speziale G
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2021 Jul; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33984125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique.
    Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Fischlein T; Folliguet T; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; McGlothlin A; Kappert U; Pfeiffer S; Corbi P; Lorusso R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 161(3):920-932. PubMed ID: 33478837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial between conventional versus sutureless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: Impact of mini and full sternotomy access at 1-year follow-up.
    Fischlein T; Caporali E; Folliguet T; Kappert U; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; Bonaros N; Fabre O; Corbi P; Troise G; Andreas M; Pinaud F; Pfeiffer S; Kueri S; Tan E; Voisine P; Girdauskas E; Rega F; García-Puente J; Lorusso R
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 368():56-61. PubMed ID: 35944771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.
    Lorusso R; Folliguet T; Shrestha M; Meuris B; Kappetein AP; Roselli E; Klersy C; Nozza M; Verhees L; Larracas C; Goisis G; Fischlein T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 68(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 30497085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results.
    Cresce GD; Sella M; Hinna Danesi T; Favaro A; Salvador L
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Autumn; 32(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 31972301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sutureless valves versus aortic root enlargement for aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Agarwal R; Arnav A; Ranjan A; Mudgal S; Singh D
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2023 Jul; 31(6):524-532. PubMed ID: 37415531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional study.
    Muneretto C; Solinas M; Folliguet T; Di Bartolomeo R; Repossini A; Laborde F; Rambaldini M; Santarpino G; Di Bacco L; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Mar; 163(3):925-935.e5. PubMed ID: 32727681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Analysis of Early Results after Valve Replacement in Isolated Aortic Valve Stenosis by Using Sutureless vs. Stented Bioprostheses: A Single-Center Middle-Income Country Experience.
    Kaitovic M; Micovic S; Nesic I; Raickovic T; Dotlic J; Stojanovic I; Gazibara T
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 May; 59(6):. PubMed ID: 37374235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
    König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sutureless versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
    Santarpino G; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Dell'Aquila AM; Jessl J; Cuomo F; von Wardenburg C; Fischlein T; Pauschinger M; Schwab J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 29092108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sutureless Versus Stented Valve in Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annulus.
    Shalabi A; Spiegelstein D; Sternik L; Feinberg MS; Kogan A; Levin S; Orlov B; Nachum E; Lipey A; Raanani E
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jul; 102(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 27016426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?
    Beckmann E; Martens A; Alhadi F; Hoeffler K; Umminger J; Kaufeld T; Sarikouch S; Koigeldiev N; Cebotari S; Schmitto JD; Haverich A; Shrestha M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 22(6):744-9. PubMed ID: 26920726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk predictors that impact long-term prognosis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dokollari A; Margaryan R; Torregrossa G; Sicouri S; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Prifti E; Veshti A; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():10-19. PubMed ID: 37062610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Sutureless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Guner Y; Çiçek A; Karacalilar M; Ersoy B; Kyaruzi M; Onan B
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 May; 37(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 34236798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.
    Gotzmann M; Wilbring M; Charitos E; Treede H; Silaschi M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):584-594. PubMed ID: 30900219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the role of sutureless aortic valves in today's armamentarium?
    Karangelis D; Mazine A; Roubelakis A; Alexiou C; Fragoulis S; Mazer CD; Yanagawa B; Latter D; Bonneau D
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2017 Feb; 15(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 27977305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.