These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33984580)

  • 1. Breast glandularity and mean glandular dose assessment using a deep learning framework: Virtual patients study.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2021 Mar; 83():264-277. PubMed ID: 33984580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
    Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients.
    Shim S; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Hoetker AM; Unkelbach J; Boss A
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2417-2428. PubMed ID: 36622370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Maeda M; Okamoto R; Nakamura M; Higashida Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33120368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of glandular dose in mammography based on artificial neural networks.
    Trevisan Massera R; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095009. PubMed ID: 32101806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mean glandular dose to patients from stereotactic breast biopsy procedures.
    Paixão L; Chevalier M; Hurtado-Romero AE; Garayoa J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145008. PubMed ID: 29877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography.
    Massera RT; Fernández-Varea JM; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33857930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
    Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
    J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GEANT4 for breast dosimetry: parameters optimization study.
    Fedon C; Longo F; Mettivier G; Longo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(16):N311-23. PubMed ID: 26267405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.