These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3398492)

  • 21. Articulatory, developmental, and gender effects on measures of fundamental frequency and jitter.
    Sussman JE; Sapienza C
    J Voice; 1994 Jun; 8(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 8061770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pitch-matching accuracy in trained singers and untrained individuals: the impact of musical interference and noise.
    Estis JM; Dean-Claytor A; Moore RE; Rowell TL
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 20456914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequency modulation characteristics of sustained /a/ sung in vocal vibrato.
    Horii Y
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 2601313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Pettibone C
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Nov; 118(5):2925-2934. PubMed ID: 28835529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability of pitch discrimination of vowel and piano tones.
    Liu TA; Channell RW
    J Voice; 1995 Dec; 9(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 8574305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of fundamental frequency nasalance between trained singers and nonsingers for sung vowels.
    Fowler LP; Morris RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Oct; 116(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 17987779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experience-dependent modulation of right anterior insula and sensorimotor regions as a function of noise-masked auditory feedback in singers and nonsingers.
    Kleber B; Friberg A; Zeitouni A; Zatorre R
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():97-110. PubMed ID: 27916664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of short-term auditory masking on fundamental frequency variability.
    Rastatter M; Rivers C
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 6677636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Change of voice characteristics during +3 Gz acceleration.
    Mürbe D; Lindner P; Zöllner S; Welsch H; Kuhlisch E; Hüttenbrink KB; Sundberg J
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Dec; 75(12):1081-5. PubMed ID: 15619865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback.
    Sivasankar M; Bauer JJ; Babu T; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):850-7. PubMed ID: 15759705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for vowels produced by male children.
    Arnold KS; Emanuel FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Sep; 22(3):613-26. PubMed ID: 502518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-Dependent Modulation of Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Intensity.
    Hilger AI; Levant S; Kim JH; Lester-Smith RA; Larson C
    J Voice; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36210225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nonconscious control of fundamental voice frequency.
    Hafke HZ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):273-8. PubMed ID: 18177157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speechreading enhancement by voice fundamental frequency: the effects of Fo contour distortions.
    Hnath-Chisolm T; Boothroyd A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1160-8. PubMed ID: 1447926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Characteristic of the vocal vowels with different pitch frequency].
    Andreeva NG; Kulikov GA
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Jun; 89(6):715-24. PubMed ID: 12966709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.
    Xu Y; Larson CR; Bauer JJ; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1168-78. PubMed ID: 15376682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrinsic fO differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners.
    Fowler CA; Brown JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 9259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can intrinsic vowel Fo be explained by source/tract coupling?
    Ewan WG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 512198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on primary stressing during spontaneous speech.
    Colcord RD; Loren CA; Rastatter M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1217-8. PubMed ID: 3808897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.