These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33985188)
1. Theoretical analysis of surface-shape-induced decorrelation noise in multi-wavelength digital holography. Piniard M; Sorrente B; Hug G; Picart P Opt Express; 2021 May; 29(10):14720-14735. PubMed ID: 33985188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling of speckle decorrelation in digital Fresnel holographic interferometry. Meteyer E; Foucart F; Pezerat C; Picart P Opt Express; 2021 Oct; 29(22):36180-36200. PubMed ID: 34809036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of accuracy in digital holography by use of multiple holograms. Baumbach T; Kolenovic E; Kebbel V; Jüptner W Appl Opt; 2006 Aug; 45(24):6077-85. PubMed ID: 16892106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase calibration unwrapping algorithm for phase data corrupted by strong decorrelation speckle noise. Xia H; Montresor S; Guo R; Li J; Yan F; Cheng H; Picart P Opt Express; 2016 Dec; 24(25):28713-28730. PubMed ID: 27958515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decorrelation and anti-correlation from defocus in digital holographic interferometry. Meteyer E; Pezerat C; Picart P J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2023 Apr; 40(4):B33-B46. PubMed ID: 37132971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quasi noise-free digital holography. Bianco V; Memmolo P; Paturzo M; Finizio A; Javidi B; Ferraro P Light Sci Appl; 2016 Sep; 5(9):e16142. PubMed ID: 30167185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refocus criterion based on maximization of the coherence factor in digital three-wavelength holographic interferometry. Picart P; Montresor S; Sakharuk O; Muravsky L Opt Lett; 2017 Jan; 42(2):275-278. PubMed ID: 28081091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspect ratio of elongated polychromatic far-field speckles of continuous and discrete spectral distribution with respect to surface roughness characterization. Lehmann P Appl Opt; 2002 Apr; 41(10):2008-14. PubMed ID: 11936804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electro-optic frequency comb based IPDA lidar: assessment of speckle issues. Patiño W; Cézard N Opt Express; 2022 May; 30(10):15963-15977. PubMed ID: 36221450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selectable-wavelength low-coherence digital holography with chromatic phase shifter. Pham QD; Hasegawa S; Kiire T; Barada D; Yatagai T; Hayasaki Y Opt Express; 2012 Aug; 20(18):19744-56. PubMed ID: 23037027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-wavelength digital holography: single-shot shape evaluation using speckle displacements and regularization. Bergström P; Khodadad D; Hällstig E; Sjödahl M Appl Opt; 2014 Jan; 53(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 24513998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roughness determination by speckle-wavelength decorrelation. Schertler DJ; George N Opt Lett; 1993 Mar; 18(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 19802146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep Learning Network for Speckle De-Noising in Severe Conditions. Tahon M; Montrésor S; Picart P J Imaging; 2022 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 35735964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speckle noise suppression in digital holography by angular diversity with phase-only spatial light modulator. Wang Y; Meng P; Wang D; Rong L; Panezai S Opt Express; 2013 Aug; 21(17):19568-78. PubMed ID: 24105504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wavelength decorrelation of speckle in propagation through a thick diffuser. Chang NA; George N; Chi W J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Feb; 28(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 21293529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning speckle de-noising algorithms for coherent metrology: a review and a phase-shifted iterative scheme [Invited]. Montresor S; Tahon M; Picart P J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Feb; 39(2):A62-A78. PubMed ID: 35200959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On-speckle suppression in IR digital holography. Bianco V; Memmolo P; Paturzo M; Ferraro P Opt Lett; 2016 Nov; 41(22):5226-5229. PubMed ID: 27842099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative phase imaging by three-wavelength digital holography. Mann CJ; Bingham PR; Paquit VC; Tobin KW Opt Express; 2008 Jun; 16(13):9753-64. PubMed ID: 18575544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assessment of combined quantization-shot-noise-induced decorrelation noise in high-speed digital holographic metrology. Poittevin J; Picart P; Gautier F; Pezerat C Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(24):30917-32. PubMed ID: 26698724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speckle reduction in digital holography with low-dimensional reconstruction. Lin W; Chen L; Cai W; Hu Y; Wen K Appl Opt; 2021 Feb; 60(5):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 33690593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]