302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33985487)
1. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to assess the thickness of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean section.
Nagy Afifi A; Ahmed Taymour M; Mamdouh El-Khayat W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():145-151. PubMed ID: 35203047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Tang X; Wang J; Du Y; Xie M; Zhang H; Xu H; Hua K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():1-6. PubMed ID: 31520876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.
Rasheedy R; Sammour H; Elkholy A; Fadel E
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 31077871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between ultrasonographic parameters of Cesarean scar defect and outcome of early termination of pregnancy.
Au HK; Liu CF; Tzeng CR; Chien LW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 25865778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section scar diverticulum evaluation by saline contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: The relationship between variable parameters and longer menstrual bleeding.
Yao M; Wang W; Zhou J; Sun M; Zhu J; Chen P; Wang X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 28168867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery.
Bhatia A; Palacio M; Wright AM; Yeo GSH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 34254386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetric and Gynecologic Outcomes after the Transvaginal Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect in a Series of 183 Women.
Deng K; Liu W; Chen Y; Lin S; Huang X; Wu C; Wang H; Wang J; Chen L; Liu X; Zheng Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 33326862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):455-460. PubMed ID: 28186617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
