BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33985866)

  • 1. Penetration of inferior alveolar nerve canal increased by bicortical fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in mandibular prognathism.
    Sinha SP; Duong TDH; Duy TT; Ko EW; Chen YR; Huang CS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Feb; 51(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 33985866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Fukai Y; Tokitsu T; Tomikawa M; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Morimoto Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3022-7. PubMed ID: 20739116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness in mandibular prognathic patients with neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Huang CS; Syu JJ; Ko EW; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2153.e1-10. PubMed ID: 24135253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Kaneuji T; Nogami S; Yamamoto N; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 21549489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve imaging and neurosensory impairment following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal Class III cases with mandibular prognathism.
    Aizenbud D; Ciceu C; Hazan-Molina H; Abu-El-Naaj I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 22115977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Tsuji Y; Muto T; Kawakami J; Takeda S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 34(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15741030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical position of the mandibular canal in relation to the buccal cortical bone in Chinese patients with different dentofacial relationships.
    Huang CY; Liao YF
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2016 Nov; 115(11):981-990. PubMed ID: 26723862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
    Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The position and course of mandibular canal through mandibular ramus in patients with prognathism].
    Ma J; Lu L; Song CX
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Apr; 17(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 18470429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the mandibular ramus fracture line after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):e648-52. PubMed ID: 23078827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maintaining the space between the mandibular ramus segments during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy does not influence the stability.
    Vamvanij N; Chinpaisarn C; Denadai R; Seo HJ; Pai BCJ; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 Sep; 120(9):1768-1776. PubMed ID: 33775535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
    Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Lingual Splitting Patterns and the Lateral Bone Cut Ends Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
    Khaleel AA; Bede SY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):e728-e731. PubMed ID: 37316983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant Treatment after Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy and Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Patient with Mandibular Prognathism and Multiple Missing Maxillary Teeth.
    Furuya Y; Yamamoto M; Ito T; Takaki T; Shibahara T; Yajima Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018 Nov; 59(4):285-290. PubMed ID: 30333374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation.
    Yamashita Y; Mizuashi K; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17150332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.
    Kim YI; Park SB; Jung YH; Hwang DS; Lee JY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2893-8. PubMed ID: 22726704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.