203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33986058)
1. Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin A; Sarhanis P; Ind T
BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e045888. PubMed ID: 33986058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in People With Obesity: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(6):1-70. PubMed ID: 38026449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer.
El-Achi V; Weishaupt J; Carter J; Saidi S
J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 32737804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical trends, outcomes and disparities in minimal invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in England: a retrospective cohort study.
Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin AP; Sarhanis P; Ind T
BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e036222. PubMed ID: 32938592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability between individual surgeons in route of hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer in Florida.
Carrubba AR; Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Hodge DO; Robertson MW; DeStephano CC
Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 31():55-60. PubMed ID: 31539642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic and laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study and economic evaluation in England.
McCarthy A; Samarakoon D; Gray J; Mcmeekin P; McCarthy S; Newton C; Nobbenhuis M; Lippiatt J; Twigg J
BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e073990. PubMed ID: 37770262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.
Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.
Tomov ST; Gorchev GA; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova NH; Tomova VD; Gorcheva ZV; Ahmad S
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1367-1382. PubMed ID: 35142980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal vs. robotic hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer: A comparison of outcomes and cost of care.
Nitschmann CC; Multinu F; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Langstraat CL; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Cliby WA; Mariani A; Dowdy SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jun; 145(3):555-561. PubMed ID: 28392125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Open Hysterectomy With or Without Lymphadenectomy for Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Medical Research Council ASTEC Trial.
Kyrgiou M; Swart AM; Qian W; Warwick J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1424-36. PubMed ID: 26244758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.
Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
