203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33986058)
21. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Venous thromboembolism following minimally invasive surgery among women with endometrial cancer.
Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Littell RD; Garcia C; Conell C; Powell CB
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Aug; 142(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 27264213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does Surgical Teaching Take Time? Resident Participation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Conell C; Garcia C; Littell RD; Powell CB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 28336363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan.
Isoyama K; Matsuura M; Hayasaka M; Nagao S; Nishimura Y; Yoshioka T; Imai Y; Miyagi E; Suzuki Y; Saito T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():129-135. PubMed ID: 37660507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease in the United States: in-hospital use of opioid and non-opioid analgesics.
Garzon S; Mariani A; Weaver AL; Mcgree ME; Uccella S; Ghezzi F; Dowdy SC; Langstraat CL; Glaser GE
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):182. PubMed ID: 38668935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.
Scalici J; Laughlin BB; Finan MA; Wang B; Rocconi RP
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 25462206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.
Yoshida H; Machida H; Matsuo K; Terai Y; Fujii T; Mandai M; Kawana K; Kobayashi H; Mikami M; Nagase S
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e56. PubMed ID: 36929580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014.
Moawad G; Liu E; Song C; Fu AZ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188812. PubMed ID: 29190666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu C; Lund K; Iachina M; Korsholm M; Jensen PT
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 30810740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends and comparative effectiveness of inpatient radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States (2012-2015).
Uppal S; Rebecca Liu J; Kevin Reynolds R; Rice LW; Spencer RJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):133-138. PubMed ID: 30424895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
