These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33987994)

  • 1. Prognostic Prediction Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters from Non-Enhancing, T2-High-Signal-Intensity Lesions in Patients with Glioblastoma.
    Jo SW; Choi SH; Lee EJ; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1369-1378. PubMed ID: 33987994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognosis prediction of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity lesions in glioblastoma patients after standard treatment: application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Kim R; Choi SH; Yun TJ; Lee ST; Park CK; Kim TM; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 27357131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Pharmacokinetic Variables in Glioblastoma Patients: Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Lesions and Non-Enhancing T2 High-Signal Intensity Lesions.
    Kang Y; Hong EK; Rhim JH; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SW; Choi SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):707-716. PubMed ID: 32410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster Analysis of DSC MRI, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI, and DWI Parameters Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Glioblastoma after Removal of the Contrast-Enhancing Component: A Preliminary Study.
    Chung H; Seo H; Choi SH; Park CK; Kim TM; Park SH; Won JK; Lee JH; Lee ST; Lee JY; Hwang I; Kang KM; Yun TJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 Nov; 43(11):1559-1566. PubMed ID: 36175084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation of grade II and III oligodendrogliomas from grade II and III astrocytomas: a histogram analysis of perfusion parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI.
    Lee JY; Ahn KJ; Lee YS; Jang JH; Jung SL; Kim BS
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):723-731. PubMed ID: 28862024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in predicting progression of enhancing lesions persisting after standard treatment in glioblastoma patients: a prospective study.
    Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Choi HJ; You SH; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3156-3166. PubMed ID: 27975145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic Predictions for Patients with Glioblastoma after Standard Treatment: Application of Contrast Leakage Information from DSC-MRI within Nonenhancing FLAIR High-Signal-Intensity Lesions.
    Kim SH; Cho KH; Choi SH; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Dec; 40(12):2052-2058. PubMed ID: 31727756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostication of anaplastic astrocytoma patients: application of contrast leakage information of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kim HS; Kwon SL; Choi SH; Hwang I; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 31953664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Initial Area Under the Curve Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Improves Prognosis Prediction in Glioblastoma with Unmethylated
    Choi YS; Ahn SS; Lee HJ; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim EH; Kim SH; Lee SK
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Aug; 38(8):1528-1535. PubMed ID: 28642265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Nonenhancing T2 High-Signal-Intensity Lesions in Baseline and Posttreatment Glioblastoma: Temporal Change and Prognostic Value.
    Hwang I; Choi SH; Park CK; Kim TM; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Jan; 41(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 31806595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of Prognosis in Glioblastoma Using Radiomics Features of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Pak E; Choi KS; Choi SH; Park CK; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 34269536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical parameters outweigh diffusion- and perfusion-derived MRI parameters in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
    Burth S; Kickingereder P; Eidel O; Tichy D; Bonekamp D; Weberling L; Wick A; Löw S; Hertenstein A; Nowosielski M; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; Bendszus M; Radbruch A
    Neuro Oncol; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1673-1679. PubMed ID: 27298312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary brain lymphoma and glioblastoma: evaluation of DCE T1 and DSC T2 MRI perfusion findings.
    Soydan H; Sözmen Cılız D; Cesur T; Tezgör Aksakal E
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jul; 65(7):800-807. PubMed ID: 38798137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics to distinguish microcystic meningiomas from traditional Grade I meningiomas and high-grade gliomas.
    Hussain NS; Moisi MD; Keogh B; McCullough BJ; Rostad S; Newell D; Gwinn R; Foltz G; Mayberg M; Aguedan B; Good V; Fouke SJ
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 126(4):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 27285539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
    Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of methylguanine methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging.
    Ahn SS; Shin NY; Chang JH; Kim SH; Kim EH; Kim DW; Lee SK
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Aug; 121(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 24949678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uninterpretable Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Images in Patients with Post-Treatment Glioblastomas: Cross-Validation of Alternative Imaging Options.
    Heo YJ; Kim HS; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136380. PubMed ID: 26296086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of survival and progression in glioblastoma patients using temporal perfusion changes during radiochemotherapy.
    Larsson C; Groote I; Vardal J; Kleppestø M; Odland A; Brandal P; Due-Tønnessen P; Holme SS; Hope TR; Meling TR; Fosse E; Emblem KE; Bjørnerud A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():106-112. PubMed ID: 32004711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma.
    Lu S; Wang S; Gao Q; Zhou M; Li Y; Cao P; Hong X; Shi H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 28806317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of Early Response to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Amide Proton Transfer-weighted and Perfusion-weighted MRI compared with Diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Park JE; Kim HS; Park SY; Jung SC; Kim JH; Heo HY
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):397-406. PubMed ID: 32154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.