These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33988331)
21. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study. Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters. Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Imaging of occlusal dental caries (decay) with near-IR light at 1310-nm. Bühler C; Ngaotheppitak P; Fried D Opt Express; 2005 Jan; 13(2):573-82. PubMed ID: 19488387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of caries diagnostic modalities: A clinical study in 40 subjects. Mansour S; Ajdaharian J; Nabelsi T; Chan G; Wilder-Smith P Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Dec; 48(10):924-928. PubMed ID: 26997616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of smooth surface caries in vitro. Nakagawa H; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 23084870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Monitoring the caries process. Optical methods for clinical diagnosis and quantification of enamel caries. Angmar-Mànsson B; al-Khateeb S; Tranaeus S Eur J Oral Sci; 1996 Aug; 104(4 ( Pt 2)):480-5. PubMed ID: 8930601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On caries prevalence and school-based fluoride programmes in Swedish adolescents. Sköld UM Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (178):11-75. PubMed ID: 16270700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of early occlusal caries pre- and post-sealant application--an imaging approach. Holtzman JS; Ballantine J; Fontana M; Wang A; Calantog A; Benavides E; Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Chen Z; Wilder-Smith P Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Aug; 46(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 24729412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age. Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries. Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation. Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiographic Yield for Clinical Caries Diagnosis in Young Adults: Indicators for Radiographic Examination. Carvalho JC; Mestrinho HD; Guillet A; Maltz M Caries Res; 2020; 54(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32101874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study. Dias da Silva PR; Martins Marques M; Steagall W; Medeiros Mendes F; Lascala CA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 20729186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning. Hintze H; Wenzel A Caries Res; 2003; 37(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 12652049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imaging artificial caries on the occlusal surfaces with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Jones RS; Darling CL; Featherstone JD; Fried D Caries Res; 2006; 40(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 16508263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection ability and direction effect of photothermal-radiometry and modulated-luminescence for non-cavitated approximal caries. Xing H; Eckert GJ; Ando M J Dent; 2019 Nov; 90():103221. PubMed ID: 31678477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Near-infrared imaging of secondary caries lesions around composite restorations at wavelengths from 1300-1700-nm. Simon JC; A Lucas S; Lee RC; Darling CL; Staninec M; Vaderhobli R; Pelzner R; Fried D Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 26876234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries with Dynamic Slicing of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images. Luong MN; Shimada Y; Araki K; Yoshiyama M; Tagami J; Sadr A Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32192069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]