These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33988689)

  • 1. Reconceptualizing How to Support Surrogates Making Medical Decisions for Critically Ill Patients.
    Dionne-Odom JN; White DB
    JAMA; 2021 Jun; 325(21):2147-2148. PubMed ID: 33988689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.
    Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
    Horttor BJ
    N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancies in end-of-life decisions between elderly patients and their named surrogates.
    Foo AS; Lee TW; Soh CR
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2012 Apr; 41(4):141-53. PubMed ID: 22635278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advance directives lessen the decisional burden of surrogate decision-making for the chronically critically ill.
    Hickman RL; Pinto MD
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Mar; 23(5-6):756-65. PubMed ID: 24330417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical illness research involving collection of genomic data: the conundrum posed by low levels of genomic literacy among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients.
    Iverson E; Celious A; Shehane E; Oerke M; Warren V; Eastman A; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):53-7. PubMed ID: 23933776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sharing death and dying: advance directives, autonomy and the family.
    Chan HM
    Bioethics; 2004 Apr; 18(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 15146852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The illusion of autonomy at the end of life: unconsented life support and the wrongful life analogy.
    Peters PG
    UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Feb; 45(3):673-731. PubMed ID: 11660813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior Advance Care Planning Is Associated with Less Decisional Conflict among Surrogates for Critically Ill Patients.
    Chiarchiaro J; Buddadhumaruk P; Arnold RM; White DB
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Oct; 12(10):1528-33. PubMed ID: 26240996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making health care decisions for others.
    May WE
    Ethics Medics; 1997 Jun; 22(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11657442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing the family support tool: An interactive, web-based tool to help families navigate the complexities of surrogate decision making in ICUs.
    Suen AO; Butler RA; Arnold R; Myers B; Witteman HO; Cox CE; Argenas A; Buddadhumaruk P; Bursic A; Ernecoff NC; Shields AM; Tran DK; White DB
    J Crit Care; 2020 Apr; 56():132-139. PubMed ID: 31896447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.
    Johnson SK; Bautista CA; Hong SY; Weissfeld L; White DB
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2011 Apr; 183(7):915-21. PubMed ID: 21037019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of surrogate decisions in intensive care scenarios.
    Li LL; Cheong KY; Yaw LK; Liu EH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Feb; 35(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17323665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision conflict and regret among surrogate decision makers in the medical intensive care unit.
    Miller JJ; Morris P; Files DC; Gower E; Young M
    J Crit Care; 2016 Apr; 32():79-84. PubMed ID: 26810482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.
    Devnani R; Slaven JE; Bosslet GT; Montz K; Inger L; Burke ES; Torke AM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 28840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
    White PD
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paper shields: why advance directives still don't work.
    McGee G
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 11657337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The moral underpinning of the proxy-provider relationship: issues of trust and distrust.
    Collopy BJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11657141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer-based education intervention to enhance surrogates' informed consent for genomics research.
    Shelton AK; Freeman BD; Fish AF; Bachman JA; Richardson LI
    Am J Crit Care; 2015 Mar; 24(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 25727275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proxy consent for a medical gamble.
    Carson RA; Aranow H; Rhoden NK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Jun; 10(3):22-4. PubMed ID: 11643631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.