These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33989599)

  • 1. Tools to Assess the Risk of Bias and Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Patrini M; Oliveira-Souza AIS; Dennett L; Arienti C; Dahchi M; Negrini S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 102(8):1606-1613. PubMed ID: 33989599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attrition, missing data, compliance, and related biases in randomized controlled trials of rehabilitation interventions: towards improving reporting and conduct.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Machalicek W; DE Oliveira-Souza AI; Dennett L; Ballenberger N
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):817-828. PubMed ID: 33165311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reporting quality and risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for migraine: Methodological study based on STRICTA and RoB 2.0.
    Lu T; Lu C; Li H; Xing X; Deng X; Li X; Wang Y; Niu J; Liu Y; Yang K
    Complement Ther Med; 2020 Aug; 52():102433. PubMed ID: 32951707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist: Methodology of Development of a Reporting Guideline Specific to Rehabilitation.
    Negrini S; Armijo-Olivo S; Patrini M; Frontera WR; Heinemann AW; Machalicek W; Whyte J; Arienti C;
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 99(3):210-215. PubMed ID: 31851008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses.
    Amiri M; Kumbhare D
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):790-798. PubMed ID: 32935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
    Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Ospina M; Saltaji H; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Sep; 13():116. PubMed ID: 24044807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, Part II: focus on risk of bias tools reveals few meet current appraisal standards.
    Kolaski K; Clarke M; Logan LR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111460. PubMed ID: 39025376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Rogers T; Hartling L; Saltaji H; Cummings GG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():88. PubMed ID: 24070072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials of Moxibustion Using STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Moxibustion (STRICTOM) and Risk of Bias (ROB).
    Kim SY; Lee EJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Jung IC; Kim YI
    J Acupunct Meridian Stud; 2017 Aug; 10(4):261-275. PubMed ID: 28889843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of attrition, missing data, compliance, and related biases and analyses strategies on treatment effects in randomized controlled trials in rehabilitation: a methodological review.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Machalicek W; Dennett L; Ballenberger N
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):799-816. PubMed ID: 33165312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for Reporting on Rehabilitation Interventions.
    Whyte J; Dijkers MP; Fasoli SE; Ferraro M; Katz LW; Norton S; Parent E; Pinto SM; Sisto SA; Van Stan JH; Wengerd L
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 100(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 32889858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criteria to Evaluate the Quality of Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Interventions.
    Wang D; Taylor-Vaisey A; Negrini S; Côté P
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 100(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 32969969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying items to assess methodological quality in physical therapy trials: a factor analysis.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Fuentes J; Saltaji H; Ha C; Chisholm A; Pasichnyk D; Rogers T
    Phys Ther; 2014 Sep; 94(9):1272-84. PubMed ID: 24786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Ndounga Diakou LA; Ntoumi F; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):291. PubMed ID: 28676066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.
    Choi J; Jun JH; Kang BK; Kim KH; Lee MS
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():429. PubMed ID: 25373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of reporting quality in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for post-stroke rehabilitation using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.
    Zeng J; Lin G; Li L; Lu L; Chen C; Lu L
    Acupunct Med; 2017 Apr; 35(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 27535816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
    Rademaker MM; Ramakers GGJ; Smit AL; Hooft L; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235535. PubMed ID: 32650340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological Issues in Rehabilitation Research: A Scoping Review.
    Arienti C; Armijo-Olivo S; Minozzi S; Tjosvold L; Lazzarini SG; Patrini M; Negrini S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 102(8):1614-1622.e14. PubMed ID: 33989598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health.
    Tikka C; Verbeek J; Ijaz S; Hoving JL; Boschman J; Hulshof C; de Boer AG
    Occup Environ Med; 2021 Sep; 78(9):691-696. PubMed ID: 34162718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.