151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33990992)
1. On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard.
Schofield MR; Maze MJ; Crump JA; Rubach MP; Galloway R; Sharples KJ
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4751-4763. PubMed ID: 33990992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
Wang C; Lin X; Nelson KP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rejoinder to "On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard".
Schofield MR; Maze MJ; Crump JA; Rubach MP; Galloway RL; Sharples KJ
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4770-4771. PubMed ID: 34515367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Bayesian Hui-Walter and logistic regression latent class models to estimate diagnostic test characteristics with simulated data.
Ni H; Koop G; Klugkist I; Nielen M
Prev Vet Med; 2023 Aug; 217():105972. PubMed ID: 37499309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.
van Smeden M; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; de Groot JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 24272278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Latent Class Analysis: Insights about design and analysis of schistosomiasis diagnostic studies.
Koukounari A; Jamil H; Erosheva E; Shiff C; Moustaki I
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009042. PubMed ID: 33539357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian latent class models to estimate diagnostic test accuracies of COVID-19 tests.
Hartnack S; Eusebi P; Kostoulas P
J Med Virol; 2021 Feb; 93(2):639-640. PubMed ID: 32770741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bayesian approach to model the conditional correlation between several diagnostic tests and various replicated subjects measurements.
Pereira da Silva HD; Ascaso C; Gonçalves AQ; Orlandi PP; Abellana R
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3154-3170. PubMed ID: 28543307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latent class models for Echinococcus multilocularis diagnosis in foxes in Switzerland in the absence of a gold standard.
Otero-Abad B; Armua-Fernandez MT; Deplazes P; Torgerson PR; Hartnack S
Parasit Vectors; 2017 Dec; 10(1):612. PubMed ID: 29258612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostic test accuracy using Bayesian latent class analysis in the presence of conditional dependence between the diagnostic tests used in a community-based tuberculosis screening study.
Keter AK; Lynen L; Van Heerden A; Wong E; Reither K; Goetghebeur E; Jacobs BKM
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282417. PubMed ID: 36862729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary on "On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold-standard" by Schofield et al.
Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4766-4769. PubMed ID: 34515365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian latent class models for identifying canine visceral leishmaniosis using diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.
Ozanne MV; Brown GD; Scorza BM; Mahachi K; Toepp AJ; Petersen CA
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2022 Mar; 16(3):e0010236. PubMed ID: 35286301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard using an Anaplasma marginale field data set].
Müllner P; Dreher UM; Meli ML; Lutz H; Hofman-Lehmann R; Doherr MG
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(9-10):416-22. PubMed ID: 16206931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
