157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33991030)
41. Impact of Breast Density Legislation on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of 110 Radiology Facilities.
Nayak L; Miyake KK; Leung JW; Price ER; Liu YI; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Thomas WR; Lipson JA; Daniel BL; Hargreaves J; Brenner RJ; Bassett LW; Ojeda-Fournier H; Lindfors KK; Feig SA; Ikeda DM
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 27296462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification - Review of the evidence.
Houssami N; Lee CI
Breast; 2018 Dec; 42():102-112. PubMed ID: 30236594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Screening Breast Ultrasound: Update After 10 Years of Breast Density Notification Laws.
Butler RS; Hooley RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1424-1435. PubMed ID: 32182096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Characteristics of State Policies Impact Health Care Delivery: An Analysis of Mammographic Dense Breast Notification and Insurance Legislation.
HornĂ½ M; Shwartz M; Duszak R; Christiansen CL; Cohen AB; Burgess JF
Med Care; 2018 Sep; 56(9):798-804. PubMed ID: 30036236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Women's response to state-mandated language in dense breast notification.
Spalluto LB; Roumie CL; Bonnett KR; Schlundt DG; DeBenedectis CM; Wilkins CH
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):1046-1050. PubMed ID: 30255589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening.
Yeh VM; Schnur JB; Margolies L; Montgomery GH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25556313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior.
Gur D; Klym AH; King JL; Bandos AI; Sumkin JH
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):679-83. PubMed ID: 25837723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Breast Density Legislation in New England: A Survey Study of Practicing Radiologists.
Lourenco AP; DiFlorio-Alexander RM; Slanetz PJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):1265-1267. PubMed ID: 28495213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dense Breast Notification and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of Current Strategies and Sentiments.
Maimone S; McDonough M
Breast J; 2017 Mar; 23(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 27797130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density.
Lee CI; Chen LE; Elmore JG
Med Clin North Am; 2017 Jul; 101(4):725-741. PubMed ID: 28577623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Women's Understandings and Misunderstandings of Breast Density and Related Concepts: A Mixed Methods Study.
Kressin NR; Wormwood JB; Battaglia TA; Maschke AD; Slanetz PJ; Pankowska M; Gunn CM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2022 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 35230164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of breast density notification on psychosocial outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities: A systematic review.
Isautier JMJ; Wang S; Houssami N; McCaffery K; Brennan ME; Li T; Nickel B
Breast; 2024 Apr; 74():103693. PubMed ID: 38430905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast cancer supplemental screening: Women's knowledge and utilization in the era of dense breast legislation.
Aminawung JA; Hoag JR; Kyanko KA; Xu X; Richman IB; Busch SH; Gross CP
Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(15):5662-5671. PubMed ID: 32537899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Women's Reports of Dense Breast Notification Following Mammography: Findings from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.
Richards TB; Dasari S; Sabatino SA; Qin J; Miller JW; White MC
J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Jul; 35(7):2207-2209. PubMed ID: 31907792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Breast cancer related perceptions and practices of health professionals working in Brazil's network of primary care units.
Hallowell BD; Puricelli Perin DM; Simoes EJ; Paez DC; Parra DC; Brownson RC; Saraiya M
Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():216-223. PubMed ID: 29128409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Imaging Management of Breast Density, a Controversial Risk Factor for Breast Cancer.
Falcon S; Williams A; Weinfurtner J; Drukteinis JS
Cancer Control; 2017 Apr; 24(2):125-136. PubMed ID: 28441367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Breast Density Notification Law Requires New Patients Notifications.
Bergin J; Arnold A
WMJ; 2018 Jun; 117(2):94. PubMed ID: 30048581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Implications of the Breast Density Legislation for Health Care Practitioners.
Green VL
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):419-38. PubMed ID: 26992182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation.
Price ER; Hargreaves J; Lipson JA; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ; Lindfors KK; Joe BN; Leung JW; Feig SA; Bassett LW; Ojeda-Fournier H; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Love E; Ryan L; Walgenbach DD; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 24023072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Measuring the Effect of Breast Density Legislation on a State's Patients.
Radiol Technol; 2016 Nov; 88(2):189CT-192CT. PubMed ID: 27837145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]