BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33991336)

  • 1. Pelvic capacity in pregnant women, identified using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kjeldsen LL; Blankholm AD; Jurik AG; Salvig JD; Maimburg RD
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 33991336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman's pelvis?
    Reitter A; Daviss BA; Bisits A; Schollenberger A; Vogl T; Herrmann E; Louwen F; Zangos S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):662.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24949546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
    Michel SC; Rake A; Treiber K; Seifert B; Chaoui R; Huch R; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 12239066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of squatting while pregnant on pelvic dimensions: A computational simulation to understand childbirth.
    Hemmerich A; Bandrowska T; Dumas GA
    J Biomech; 2019 Apr; 87():64-74. PubMed ID: 30851977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test in Third Trimester Pregnant Women: Shifting Positions Affect Pelvic Biomechanics and Create More Room in Obstetric Diameters.
    Siccardi M; Valle C; Di Matteo F
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e13631. PubMed ID: 33816030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Malawi women's knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions: A cross-sectional descriptive survey.
    Zileni BD; Glover P; Jones M; Teoh KK; Zileni CW; Muller A
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 27329996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of a computational model for understanding the effects of an upright birthing position on the female pelvis.
    Hemmerich A; Diesbourg T; Dumas GA
    J Biomech; 2018 Aug; 77():99-106. PubMed ID: 29970228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.
    Gupta JK; Hofmeyr GJ; Shehmar M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD002006. PubMed ID: 22592681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What are the facilitators, inhibitors, and implications of birth positioning? A review of the literature.
    Priddis H; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    Women Birth; 2012 Sep; 25(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 21664208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better perineal outcomes in sitting birthing position cannot be explained by changing from upright to supine position for performing an episiotomy.
    Warmink-Perdijk WDB; Koelewijn JM; de Jonge A; van Diem MT; Lagro-Janssen ALM
    Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():1-6. PubMed ID: 26971440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining loads acting on the pelvis in upright and recumbent birthing positions: A case study.
    Hemmerich A; Geens E; Diesbourg T; Dumas GA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():10-18. PubMed ID: 29886345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
    Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of maternal position on venous return for pregnant women during MRI.
    Hughes EJ; Price AN; McCabe L; Hiscocks S; Waite L; Green E; Hutter J; Pegoretti K; Cordero-Grande L; Edwards AD; Hajnal JV; Rutherford MA
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Apr; 34(4):e4475. PubMed ID: 33480110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and supine lithotomy position: a comparative retrospective study.
    Peng G; Song L; Xie D; Huang J; Zhong Y; Tan W; Deng X
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Dec; 70(6):612-616. PubMed ID: 30037207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal pelvic dimensions of Nigerian women in Ile Ife by computed tomographic pelvimetry.
    Ma'aji SM; Adetiloye VA; Ayoola OO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2007 Jun; 14(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17599106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of pubic symphysis width in different birthing positions using ultrasound.
    Zhang S; Dumas G; Hemmerich A
    J Biomech; 2020 Dec; 113():110114. PubMed ID: 33207288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Berta M; Lindgren H; Christensson K; Mekonnen S; Adefris M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):466. PubMed ID: 31801479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Grob ATM; Olde Heuvel J; Futterer JJ; Massop D; Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL; Simonis FFJ; van der Vaart CH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1939-1944. PubMed ID: 30656361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence on birthing positions affects women's sense of control in second stage of labour.
    Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Jonge A; Korstjens I; Budé L; Lagro-Janssen TL
    Midwifery; 2013 Nov; 29(11):e107-14. PubMed ID: 23415350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.