These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33991796)

  • 1. Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings.
    Giesen CG; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103330. PubMed ID: 33991796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus-Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.
    Giesen C; Löhl V; Rothermund K; Koranyi N
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1369. PubMed ID: 30123169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner.
    Giesen CG; Rothermund K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):855-865. PubMed ID: 35064526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval effects of observationally acquired stimulus-response bindings in participants with high and low autistic traits.
    Giesen CG; Husken L; Schneider D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 35130016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning.
    Whitehead PS; Mahmoud Y; Seli P; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2968-2982. PubMed ID: 34322789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smaller Than Expected.
    Giesen CG; Nagel L; Rudolph M; Rothermund K
    Exp Psychol; 2021 May; 68(3):137-148. PubMed ID: 34374306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.
    Schiltenwolf M; Kiesel A; Frings C; Dignath D
    Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):547-561. PubMed ID: 37615755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for associated stimuli.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Mocke V; Giesen CG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Role of Memory Representations in Action Control: Neurophysiological Decoding Reveals the Reactivation of Integrated Stimulus-Response Feature Representations.
    Eggert E; Takacs A; Münchau A; Beste C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 34(7):1246-1258. PubMed ID: 35552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adapting to stimulus-response contingencies without noticing them.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1475-81. PubMed ID: 26389614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Giesen CG
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):36. PubMed ID: 36072091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.
    Hommel B; Memelink J; Zmigrod S; Colzato LS
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23884516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for a Selective Influence of Short-Term Experiences on the Retrieval of Item-Specific Long-Term Bindings.
    Dames H; Kiesel A; Pfeuffer CU
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 36072120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 29869024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.
    Giesen CG; Schmidt JR; Rothermund K
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2927. PubMed ID: 32010017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Episodic S-R bindings and emotion: about the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus-response associations.
    Waszak F; Pholulamdeth V
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 194(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 19266189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response bindings contribute to item switch costs in working memory.
    Janczyk M; Kunde W
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jul; 74(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 19838725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.
    Whitehead PS; Pfeuffer CU; Egner T
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104220. PubMed ID: 32065944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.