These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33992385)

  • 1. Consumers with high frequency of 'just about right' in JAR scales may use lower cognitive effort: Evidence from the concurrent 9-point hedonic scale and CATA question.
    Song J; Xia Y; Zhong F
    Food Res Int; 2021 May; 143():110285. PubMed ID: 33992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Method and Just-About-Right (JAR) Scale to Evaluate Korean Traditional Rice Wine (
    Lee S; Kwak HS; Kim SS; Lee Y
    Foods; 2021 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 34441672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of consumption frequency on generations of sensory product profiles using CATA questions: Case studies with two drink categories.
    Xia Y; Song J; Lee P; Shen H; Hou J; Yang J; Gao B; Zhong F
    Food Res Int; 2020 Nov; 137():109378. PubMed ID: 33233080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of static and dynamic sensory product characterizations based on check-all-that-apply questions with consumers.
    Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Zorn S; Giménez A; Castura JC; Ares G
    Food Res Int; 2017 Jul; 97():215-222. PubMed ID: 28578044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory product characterisations based on check-all-that-apply questions: Further insights on how the static (CATA) and dynamic (TCATA) approaches perform.
    Vidal L; Antúnez L; Ares G; Cuffia F; Lee PY; Le Blond M; Jaeger SR
    Food Res Int; 2019 Nov; 125():108510. PubMed ID: 31554131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of response formats and concurrent hedonic measures for optimal use of the EmoSensory® Wheel.
    Schouteten JJ; Gellynck X; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Sas B; Bredie WL; Perez-Cueto FJ; De Steur H
    Food Res Int; 2017 Mar; 93():33-42. PubMed ID: 28290278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Questionnaire design: carry-over effects of overall acceptance question placement and pre-evaluation instructions on overall acceptance scores in central location tests.
    Bastian M; Eggett DL; Jefferies LK
    J Food Sci; 2015 Feb; 80(2):S435-43. PubMed ID: 25604650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of five methodological variants of emoji questionnaires for measuring product elicited emotional associations: An application with seafood among Chinese consumers.
    Ares G; Jaeger SR
    Food Res Int; 2017 Sep; 99(Pt 1):216-228. PubMed ID: 28784478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of health/hedonic claims on consumer hedonic and sensory perception of sugar reduction: Case study with orange/passionfruit nectars.
    Oliveira D; Ares G; Deliza R
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():111-118. PubMed ID: 29735039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the sensory quality of flavored liquid milk by engaging sensory analysis and consumer preference.
    Zhi R; Zhao L; Shi J
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5305-5317. PubMed ID: 27108179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two rapid descriptive sensory techniques for profiling and screening of drivers of liking of sorghum breads.
    Aguiar LA; Rodrigues DB; Queiroz VAV; Melo L; Pineli LLO
    Food Res Int; 2020 May; 131():108999. PubMed ID: 32247453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer perception of salt-reduced breads: Comparison of single and two-bites evaluation.
    Antúnez L; Giménez A; Alcaire F; Vidal L; Ares G
    Food Res Int; 2017 Oct; 100(Pt 1):254-259. PubMed ID: 28873685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' Sensory Perception of Food Attributes: Identifying the Ideal Formulation of Gluten- and Lactose-Free Brownie Using Sensory Methodologies.
    Pio Ávila B; Cardozo LO; Alves GD; Gularte MA; Monks J; Elias MC
    J Food Sci; 2019 Dec; 84(12):3707-3716. PubMed ID: 31665555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Just-About-Right and ideal scaling provide similar insights into the influence of sensory attributes on liking.
    Li B; Hayes JE; Ziegler GR
    Food Qual Prefer; 2014 Oct; 37():71-78. PubMed ID: 25061258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer acceptance of broiler breast fillets marinated with varying levels of salt.
    Saha A; Lee Y; Meullenet JF; Owens CM
    Poult Sci; 2009 Feb; 88(2):415-23. PubMed ID: 19151357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Hedonic Responses, Facial Expressions and Self-Reported Emotions of Consumers Using Commercial Yogurts: A Cross-Cultural Study.
    Gupta M; Torrico DD; Hepworth G; Gras SL; Ong L; Cottrell JJ; Dunshea FR
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34072300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Images on the Evaluation of Jams Using Conjoint Analysis Combined with Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Questions.
    Miraballes M; Gámbaro A
    J Food Sci; 2018 Jan; 83(1):167-174. PubMed ID: 29178611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer acceptability and fragrance quality differentiate on of Mogiana coffee types using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method.
    Benedito LZ; Lima CMG; Pires FC; Amaral AE; Verruck S; Pereira RGFA
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2023; 95(2):e20200889. PubMed ID: 37341263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program.
    Lado J; Vicente E; Manzzioni A; Ares G
    J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Oct; 90(13):2268-75. PubMed ID: 20648524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 9-point hedonic scale and hedonic ranking in food science: some reappraisals and alternatives.
    Wichchukit S; O'Mahony M
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Aug; 95(11):2167-78. PubMed ID: 25378223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.