These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3399335)
1. Fixation accuracy and perceptual asymmetry for consonants. Berger JM; Perret E Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):569-70. PubMed ID: 3399335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of laterally presented words in research into cerebral asymmetry: is directional scanning likely to be a source of artifact? Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC; Taylor MJ Brain Lang; 1981 Sep; 14(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7272716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration. Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of type of center fixation stimulus on visual-field preferences: a preliminary study. Moore WH; Snow KA Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 6634317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Rayner K Psychol Bull; 1978 May; 85(3):618-60. PubMed ID: 353867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Simpson GB Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateralization: a closer look at the verbal laterality pattern in the bilateral paradigm. Kirby HW; Duda PD Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 7232099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual asymmetries in face recognition. Rhodes G Brain Cogn; 1985 Apr; 4(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 4015874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading. Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Jacobs AM; Wimmer H Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):637-48. PubMed ID: 16115655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Inhoff AW; Rayner K Percept Psychophys; 1986 Dec; 40(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 3808910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemispheric interaction in visual field asymmetry. Boles DB Cortex; 1983 Apr; 19(1):99-113. PubMed ID: 6851595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Balota DA; Pollatsek A; Rayner K Cogn Psychol; 1985 Jul; 17(3):364-90. PubMed ID: 4053565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Haidinger's brushes phenomenon for control of eye-fixation in a laterality experiment. Yamada K; Sugano L Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 3211696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Superiority of the left cerebral hemisphere in word recognition with nonverbal central fixation. Williams SM Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):895-8. PubMed ID: 6522202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnitude of suppression of binocular rivalry within the invisible pattern. Fukuda H Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 7312523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward the problem of physical and semantic component of the form during eye scanning. Bohdanecký Z; Bozkov V; Radil T Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1987; 47(2-3):93-101. PubMed ID: 3673677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual-field differences for a number--non-number classification of alphabetic and ideographic stimuli. Peereman R; Holender D Q J Exp Psychol A; 1985 May; 37(2):197-216. PubMed ID: 4023272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see. Jordan TR; Patching GR Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing effects of fixation demands on perception of lateralized words: A visual window technique for studying hemispheric asymmetry. Jordan TR; Patching GR Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 16223516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]