These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3399347)

  • 1. Comparison of reading and listening-reading techniques for administration of PIAT Reading Comprehension subtest: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):672-4. PubMed ID: 3399347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of paragraph comprehension test scores with reading versus listening-reading and multiple-choice versus nominal recall administration techniques: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Snider RL; Rintelmann JW; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 2):1131-5. PubMed ID: 2622726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores.
    Spring C; French L
    J Learn Disabil; 1990 Jan; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2295871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.
    Bowey JA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):186-214. PubMed ID: 18054365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disabled readers: their intellectual and perceptual capacities at differing ages.
    Miller JW; McKenna MC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 7255059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of mode of presentation on comprehension of below average, average and above average readers.
    Ganschow L; Weber DB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Jun; 64(3 Pt 1):899-905. PubMed ID: 3601609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid automatized naming and immediate memory functions in Chinese children who read English as a second language.
    Ding Y; Guo JP; Yang LY; Zhang D; Ning H; Richman LC
    J Learn Disabil; 2013; 46(4):347-62. PubMed ID: 22034524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in contextual facilitation: evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension.
    Nation K; Snowling MJ
    Child Dev; 1998 Aug; 69(4):996-1011. PubMed ID: 9768483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: a longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence.
    Badian NA
    J Learn Disabil; 1999; 32(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 15499714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of deficits in temporal pattern discrimination using the seashore rhythm test in young children with reading impairments.
    McGivern RF; Berka C; Languis ML; Chapman S
    J Learn Disabil; 1991 Jan; 24(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 1997629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metamemorial knowledge of good and poor readers: a developmental perspective.
    Feldt RC; Witte KL
    J Genet Psychol; 1987 Dec; 148(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 3437269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achievement in reading, verbal language, listening comprehension and locus of control of adult illiterates in a volunteer tutorial project.
    Gold PC; Horn PL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1243-50. PubMed ID: 7110868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonologic and semantic processing in reading-disabled and nondisabled males at two age levels.
    Waterman B; Lewandowski L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Feb; 55(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 8433084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there a thing called dyslexia?
    Aaron PG; Kuchta S; Grapenthin CT
    Ann Dyslexia; 1988 Jan; 38(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 24235032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading-disabled and normally achieving children.
    Feagans L; Short EJ
    Child Dev; 1984 Oct; 55(5):1727-36. PubMed ID: 6510053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting the "simple view of reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension.
    Georgiou GK; Das JP; Hayward D
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 18987265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehension of temporal terms by good and poor readers.
    Macaruso P; Bar-Shalom E; Crain S; Shankweiler D
    Lang Speech; 1989; 32 ( Pt 1)():45-67. PubMed ID: 2622300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allocation of attention during word recognition by good and poor readers.
    Gillund B; Ferraro FR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):899-902. PubMed ID: 8774029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?
    Aaron PG
    J Learn Disabil; 1991 Mar; 24(3):178-86, 191. PubMed ID: 2026959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.