These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3399361)

  • 21. Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time.
    Sanford AJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Mar; 102(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 4815190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction.
    Frassinetti F; Bolognini N; Làdavas E
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 147(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 12428141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection.
    Theeuwes J
    Perception; 1994; 23(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 7991343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parallel interhemispheric processing in hemineglect: relation to visual field defects.
    Müller-Oehring EM; Schulte T; Kasten E; Poggel DA; Müller I; Wüstenberg T; Sabel BA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2397-408. PubMed ID: 19393255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects.
    Krummenacher J; Grubert A; Müller HJ
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1382-95. PubMed ID: 20382173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Redundancy gain and coactivation in bimodal detection: evidence for the preservation of coactive processing in older adults.
    Bucur B; Allen PA; Sanders RE; Ruthruff E; Murphy MD
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P279-82. PubMed ID: 16131623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1881769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception.
    Balcetis E; Dunning D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):612-25. PubMed ID: 17014288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Donders revisited: Discrete or continuous temporal processing underlying reaction time distributions?
    Bao Y; Yang T; Lin X; Pöppel E
    Psych J; 2016 Sep; 5(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 27678483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Times for the analysis of stimuli and for the selection of responses.
    Rabbit PM
    Br Med Bull; 1971 Sep; 27(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 4941922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual perception of musical notation: registering pitch symbols in memory.
    Sloboda JA
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Feb; 28(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 1273247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Information processing and the modification of an "impulsive conceptual tempo".
    Heider ER
    Child Dev; 1971 Oct; 42(4):1276-81. PubMed ID: 5157116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.
    Jonides J; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Apr; 43(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 3362663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Limited-channel models of automatic detection: capacity and scanning in visual search.
    Fisher DL
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Nov; 89(6):662-92. PubMed ID: 7156264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception.
    Shulman HG; Greenberg SN
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 88(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 5577172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation.
    Vickers D
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 4680924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dual-task analysis of detection accuracy for the case of high target-distractor similarity: further evidence for independent processing.
    Burns D
    Percept Psychophys; 1979 Mar; 25(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 461074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry.
    Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14769065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence in support of word unitization.
    O'Hara WP
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 May; 27(5):390-402. PubMed ID: 7383827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.
    Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 26635097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.