BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33994285)

  • 1. Comparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery.
    Aslan Basli A; Yavuz Van Giersbergen M
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Aug; 30(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 33994285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning.
    Oliveira KF; Pires PDS; De-Mattia AL; Barichello E; Galvão CM; Araújo CA; Barbosa MH
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2018 Nov; 26():e3083. PubMed ID: 30517574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Body Mass on Oxygenation and Intra-Abdominal Pressure When Using a Jackson Surgical Table in the Prone Position During Lumbar Surgery.
    Ni L; Fan Y; Bian J; Deng X; Ma Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jul; 43(14):965-970. PubMed ID: 29200177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 4-cm thermoactive viscoelastic foam pad on the operating room table to prevent pressure ulcer during cardiac surgery.
    Feuchtinger J; de Bie R; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Feb; 15(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 16422733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of air-cell and gel surgical table pads and an evaluation of the influence of pressure distribution and other factors on pressure injury prevention.
    Guzman S; Allegretti AL; Kormos RL; Brienza DM
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Feb; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 33468340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.
    Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N; Rhodes S; McInnes E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013623. PubMed ID: 34097764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Curvilinear Supine Position on Tissue Interface Pressure: A Prospective Before-and-After Study.
    Guo Y; Li Y; Zhao K; Yue X; Yu Y; Kuang W; Liu J; Li X; Zhao T
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):450-454. PubMed ID: 28877111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface pressure measurement during surgery: a comparison of four operating table surfaces.
    Keller BP; van Overbeeke J; van der Werken C
    J Wound Care; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16669297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Interface Pressures and Subjective Comfort of Pressure-Relieving Overlays on the Operating Table for Healthy Volunteers.
    Han MJ; Ko S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33807963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, in vivo evaluation of two pressure-redistribution surfaces in healthy volunteers using pressure mapping as a quality control instrument .
    Miller S; Parker M; Blasiole N; Beinlich N; Fulton J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 23388397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries among patients undergoing prone position spine surgery in the operating room.
    Choi MA; Kim MS; Kim C
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Aug; 30(3):331-338. PubMed ID: 34154878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Prone Positional Apparatus on the Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury After Spine Surgery.
    Jin SJ; Park YS; Kim SH; Kim D; Shim WH; Jang DM; Shaffrey CI; Naik BI
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e597-e602. PubMed ID: 31054343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sacral skin blood flow response to alternating pressure operating room overlay.
    Karg P; Ranganathan VK; Churilla M; Brienza D
    J Tissue Viability; 2019 May; 28(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 30948241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial of 2 viscoelastic foam support surfaces.
    Ozyurek P; Yavuz M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2015; 29(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 26053604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Pressure Mapping to Compare Two Operating Room Surfaces in the Supine With Bent Knees Position and the Supine in Lithotomy Position.
    Teleten O; Prevatt J; Peterson L; Burleson C; Wilson M; Kirkland-Kyhn H
    Wounds; 2021 Apr; 33(4):86-90. PubMed ID: 33872201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring tissue interface pressures of two support surfaces used in the operating room.
    Blaylock B; Gardner C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Mar; 40(2):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8043178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interface Pressures of New and Worn Standard and Viscoelastic Hospital Mattresses: A Comparative Study.
    Bredesen IM
    Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Aug; 66(8):26-31. PubMed ID: 32732440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
    Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
    Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Investigation of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Comfort, and Pain in Medical Imaging.
    Angmorterh SK; England A; Webb J; Szczepura K; Stephens M; Anaman-Torgbor J; Ofori EK; Hogg P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 30777247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.
    Defloor T; De Schuijmer JD
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 13(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 10960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.