These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33994559)

  • 1. Assessing Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Multiple-Group Analysis of Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):441-465. PubMed ID: 33994559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):1059-1080. PubMed ID: 37663535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):361-381. PubMed ID: 35812811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.
    Man K; Harring JR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):617-635. PubMed ID: 32655176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.
    Zimmermann S; Klusmann D; Hampe W
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167545. PubMed ID: 27907190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multimodal Data Fusion to Detect Preknowledge Test-Taking Behavior Using Machine Learning.
    Man K
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Aug; 84(4):753-779. PubMed ID: 39055093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.
    Gorney K; Wollack JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):447-461. PubMed ID: 35991826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting Examinees With Item Preknowledge in Large-Scale Testing Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).
    Zopluoglu C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):931-961. PubMed ID: 31488920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting Item Preknowledge Using a Predictive Checking Method.
    Wang X; Liu Y; Hambleton RK
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 41(4):243-263. PubMed ID: 29881091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which Statistic Should Be Used to Detect Item Preknowledge When the Set of Compromised Items Is Known?
    Sinharay S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):403-421. PubMed ID: 29881099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of item scores and response times to detect examinees who may have benefited from item preknowledge.
    Sinharay S; Johnson MS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):397-419. PubMed ID: 31418458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Item Preknowledge Using Response Times.
    Sinharay S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 32879537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.
    Welling J; Gnambs T; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Apr; 84(2):314-339. PubMed ID: 38898880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
    Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MLGaze: Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Gaze Error Patterns in Consumer Eye Tracking Systems.
    Kar A
    Vision (Basel); 2020 May; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 32392760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the Performance of Eight Item Preknowledge Detection Statistics.
    Belov DI
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 29881040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral Activity Recognition Based on Gaze Ethograms.
    De Lope J; Graña M
    Int J Neural Syst; 2020 Jul; 30(7):2050025. PubMed ID: 32522069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.