These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33995176)
1. A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models With Small Sample Sizes. Lüdtke O; Ulitzsch E; Robitzsch A Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615162. PubMed ID: 33995176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian Prior Choice in IRT Estimation Using MCMC and Variational Bayes. Natesan P; Nandakumar R; Minka T; Rubright JD Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1422. PubMed ID: 27729878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling-A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches. Ulitzsch E; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):527-557. PubMed ID: 34928675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collinear Latent Variables in Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Estimations. Can S; van de Schoot R; Hox J Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):406-427. PubMed ID: 29795827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective and subjective prior distributions for the Gompertz distribution. Dey S; Moala FA An Acad Bras Cienc; 2018; 90(3):2643-2661. PubMed ID: 30304211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Bayesian to maximum likelihood estimation for latent growth models in the presence of a binary outcome. Kim SY; Huh D; Zhou Z; Mun EY Int J Behav Dev; 2020 Sep; 44(5):447-457. PubMed ID: 32952241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Short Note on Obtaining Point Estimates of the IRT Ability Parameter With MCMC Estimation in Mplus: How Many Plausible Values Are Needed? Luo Y; Dimitrov DM Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 30911193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Reciprocal Effects with the Bivariate STARTS Model. Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Ulitzsch E Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(3):560-579. PubMed ID: 35294313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing interval estimates for small sample ordinal CFA models. Natesan P Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1599. PubMed ID: 26579002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Li CH Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment. Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations in hierarchical Bayesian models for population pharmacokinetics. Dodds MG; Vicini P Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 32(9):1300-13. PubMed ID: 15493516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study. Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Log-logistic distribution for survival data analysis using MCMC. Al-Shomrani AA; Shawky AI; Arif OH; Aslam M Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1774. PubMed ID: 27795916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation. Depaoli S Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 23527607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Point estimation and related classification problems for several Lindley populations with application using COVID-19 data. Bal D; Tripathy MR; Kumar S J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(10):1976-2006. PubMed ID: 39071252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the stability of bivariate correlations using informative Bayesian priors: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Delfin C Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1253452. PubMed ID: 37744589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]