265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33995268)
1. Predicting the Likelihood of Live Birth in Assisted Reproductive Technology According to the Number of Oocytes Retrieved and Female Age Using a Generalized Additive Model: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 17,948 Cycles.
Zhu H; Zhao C; Xiao P; Zhang S
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():606231. PubMed ID: 33995268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cycles.
Malchau SS; Henningsen AA; Forman J; Loft A; Nyboe Andersen A; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):171-180. PubMed ID: 30541039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old.
Devesa M; Tur R; Rodríguez I; Coroleu B; Martínez F; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2010-2017. PubMed ID: 30272168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles.
Datta AK; Campbell S; Felix N; Singh JSH; Nargund G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug; 43(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 34140227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is It Possible to Expand Oocyte Donors by Decreasing Number of Oocytes for Own Use? Insights From a Large Single-Center Study.
Bu Z; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Sun Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():727339. PubMed ID: 34867777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cumulative live birth rates with autologous oocytes plateau with fewer number of cycles for each year of age > 42.
Seifer DB; Wang SF; Frankfurter D
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Oct; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 37872609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety.
Magnusson Å; Källen K; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jan; 33(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 29136154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameters of poor prognosis in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.
Van Der Kelen A; Santos-Ribeiro S; De Vos A; Verdyck P; De Rycke M; Berckmoes V; Tournaye H; Blockeel C; De Vos M; Hes FJ; Keymolen K; Verpoest W
Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2558-2566. PubMed ID: 34142115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cumulative live birth rates of 18 593 women with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation-related protocols and frozen-thawed transfer cycles.
Nie Y; Guo W; Shen X; Xie Y; Zeng Y; Gao H; Liu Y; Wang L
Hum Reprod Open; 2024; 2024(1):hoad051. PubMed ID: 38188854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?
De Neubourg D; Bogaerts K; Blockeel C; Coetsier T; Delvigne A; Devreker F; Dubois M; Gillain N; Gordts S; Wyns C
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 26537922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimum oocyte retrieved and transfer strategy in young women with normal ovarian reserve undergoing a long treatment protocol: a retrospective cohort study.
Chen YH; Xu XH; Wang Q; Zhang SD; Jiang LL; Zhang CL; Ge ZJ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1459-67. PubMed ID: 26384107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved following the "freeze-all" strategy.
Zhao Z; Shi H; Li J; Zhang Y; Chen C; Guo Y
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):14. PubMed ID: 32087702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fertilization rate as a novel indicator for cumulative live birth rate: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 9,394 complete in vitro fertilization cycles.
Scaravelli G; Zacà C; Levi Setti PE; Livi C; Ubaldi FM; Villani MT; Greco E; Coccia ME; Revelli A; Ricci G; Fusi F; Vigiliano V; De Luca R; Bolli S; Borini A
Fertil Steril; 2021 Sep; 116(3):766-773. PubMed ID: 33972085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
